Mansplaining in Academia: Narratives of Women Faculty Members at a University in Cagayan De Oro City

This study delves into the experiences of women faculty members at a tertiary university in Cagayan de Oro City who have faced “mansplaining” (a portmanteau of the words “man” and “explain”), a form of gendered communication where men condescendingly explain concepts to women, presuming their ignorance. Employing a descriptive phenomenological approach, I analyzed interviews to uncover the ways mansplaining occurs within academic settings as well as the meanings that women faculty attach to their experiences. Five emergent themes were identified, highlighting the varied manifestations of mansplaining, such as male superiors questioning women's expertise and interrupting them during discussions, which undermines women's contributions and breeds a culture of undervaluation. These encounters significantly affect women's motivation, engagement, and self-perception, instilling doubt about their capabilities and place within the academic sphere. The participants in this study refrained from attributing mansplaining solely to gender dynamics. Instead, they highlighted the critical need for explicit policies that delineate roles and responsibilities while ensuring that women have the autonomy to express their ideas and assert their expertise confidently, even when diverging from male colleagues' perspectives. These approaches can mitigate mansplaining by fostering an inclusive environment that values and respects women's expertise. The findings underscore the necessity of creating a supportive academic culture that recognizes and celebrates women's achievements without bias. Highlighting the importance of mentors and a supportive network, the study advocates for a respectful, open, and empowering academic atmosphere conducive to all faculty members' growth, irrespective of gender and position in academia. In conclusion, this research contributes to the dialogue on gender dynamics in academia, offering insights and recommendations for promoting equity and inclusivity. By addressing the systemic roots of mansplaining, institutions can cultivate a more supportive environment for women, ensuring their contributions are valued and their voices are heard, thus advancing the broader goal of gender equality in academic settings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13896149
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mansplaining in Academia: Narratives of Women Faculty Members at a University in Cagayan De Oro City

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Mansplaining in Academia: Narratives of Women Faculty Members at a University in Cagayan De Oro City

article en

Abstract

This study delves into the experiences of women faculty members at a tertiary university in Cagayan de Oro City who have faced “mansplaining” (a portmanteau of the words “man” and “explain”), a form of gendered communication where men condescendingly explain concepts to women, presuming their ignorance. Employing a descriptive phenomenological approach, I analyzed interviews to uncover the ways mansplaining occurs within academic settings as well as the meanings that women faculty attach to their experiences. Five emergent themes were identified, highlighting the varied manifestations of mansplaining, such as male superiors questioning women's expertise and interrupting them during discussions, which undermines women's contributions and breeds a culture of undervaluation. These encounters significantly affect women's motivation, engagement, and self-perception, instilling doubt about their capabilities and place within the academic sphere. The participants in this study refrained from attributing mansplaining solely to gender dynamics. Instead, they highlighted the critical need for explicit policies that delineate roles and responsibilities while ensuring that women have the autonomy to express their ideas and assert their expertise confidently, even when diverging from male colleagues' perspectives. These approaches can mitigate mansplaining by fostering an inclusive environment that values and respects women's expertise. The findings underscore the necessity of creating a supportive academic culture that recognizes and celebrates women's achievements without bias. Highlighting the importance of mentors and a supportive network, the study advocates for a respectful, open, and empowering academic atmosphere conducive to all faculty members' growth, irrespective of gender and position in academia. In conclusion, this research contributes to the dialogue on gender dynamics in academia, offering insights and recommendations for promoting equity and inclusivity. By addressing the systemic roots of mansplaining, institutions can cultivate a more supportive environment for women, ensuring their contributions are valued and their voices are heard, thus advancing the broader goal of gender equality in academic settings.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of the Philippines Cebu (PH), University of the Philippines Open University (PH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.