Parkland Grading Scale: Predictive Accuracy for Outcome Prediction in Gallbladder Surgery

Background: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) has become the preferred approach for treating symptomatic gallstone disease. Numerous preoperative cholecystitis grading systems have been created to predict both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes; however, only a few of these systems address anatomical variations encountered during surgery. Furthermore, aside from identifying challenging cases, few of these grading scales have been utilized for comparing postoperative complications. To address these limitations, the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis (PGS) was developed to assess the severity of gallbladder (GB) disease. This study aims to prospectively validate the PGS as a tool for predicting LC outcomes. Materials and Methods: The study involved 156 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The initial grade was determined solely based on the objective criteria outlined in the PGS and was assigned immediately after the initial view was observed. 5 independent surgeon raters, who were not involved in the original study, retrospectively reviewed the stored images from the study period. The cases were randomly assigned in equal numbers to each rater, who then evaluated the images using the PGS. Results: The average age of the patients in this study was 47.56 ± 17.54 years. The association between complications and PGS grades was not statistically significant. The majority of patients (67.31%) were classified under Grade 1, indicating relatively easier procedures. Grade 2 followed at 17.31%, reflecting moderate complexity. Grades 3, 4, and 5, indicating increasing levels of surgical difficulty, had lower frequencies, with Grade 3 at 7.69%, and Grades 4 and 5 at 3.85% each. The mean surgical difficulty scores were 1.25 ± 0.34 for PGS Grade 1, 1.80 ± 0.77 for PGS Grade 2, 3.38 ± 0.69 for PGS Grade 3, 4.75 ± 0.74 for PGS Grade 4, and 5 ± 0.00 for PGS Grade 5. Conclusion: The Parkland Grading Scale is a reliable tool for assessing the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and predicting both intraoperative and postoperative complications. This scale provides a practical method for evaluating gallbladder diseases, which can assist in predicting LC outcomes, guiding case allocation based on surgical difficulty, and determining the need for conversion to open surgery.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14251661
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parkland Grading Scale: Predictive Accuracy for Outcome Prediction in Gallbladder Surgery

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Parkland Grading Scale: Predictive Accuracy for Outcome Prediction in Gallbladder Surgery

article en

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) has become the preferred approach for treating symptomatic gallstone disease. Numerous preoperative cholecystitis grading systems have been created to predict both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes; however, only a few of these systems address anatomical variations encountered during surgery. Furthermore, aside from identifying challenging cases, few of these grading scales have been utilized for comparing postoperative complications. To address these limitations, the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis (PGS) was developed to assess the severity of gallbladder (GB) disease. This study aims to prospectively validate the PGS as a tool for predicting LC outcomes. Materials and Methods: The study involved 156 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The initial grade was determined solely based on the objective criteria outlined in the PGS and was assigned immediately after the initial view was observed. 5 independent surgeon raters, who were not involved in the original study, retrospectively reviewed the stored images from the study period. The cases were randomly assigned in equal numbers to each rater, who then evaluated the images using the PGS. Results: The average age of the patients in this study was 47.56 ± 17.54 years. The association between complications and PGS grades was not statistically significant. The majority of patients (67.31%) were classified under Grade 1, indicating relatively easier procedures. Grade 2 followed at 17.31%, reflecting moderate complexity. Grades 3, 4, and 5, indicating increasing levels of surgical difficulty, had lower frequencies, with Grade 3 at 7.69%, and Grades 4 and 5 at 3.85% each. The mean surgical difficulty scores were 1.25 ± 0.34 for PGS Grade 1, 1.80 ± 0.77 for PGS Grade 2, 3.38 ± 0.69 for PGS Grade 3, 4.75 ± 0.74 for PGS Grade 4, and 5 ± 0.00 for PGS Grade 5. Conclusion: The Parkland Grading Scale is a reliable tool for assessing the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and predicting both intraoperative and postoperative complications. This scale provides a practical method for evaluating gallbladder diseases, which can assist in predicting LC outcomes, guiding case allocation based on surgical difficulty, and determining the need for conversion to open surgery.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dharmsinh Desai University (IN), Sir Sayajirao General Hospital Medical College (IN), Care Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.