Phyllocnistis Zeller 1848

Phyllocnistis Zeller, 1848 The taxonomic position of this genus has long been uncertain. De Prins & Kawahara (2009) and Brito et al. (2017) conducted a thorough review of its history and pointed out that the existing taxonomic literature greatly underestimates its diversity. These moths are difficult to identify, primarily due to their small size (maximum 7 mm wingspan), a lack of distinguishing characteristics in their genitalia, and weak chitinization, which often makes interpreting abdominal structures problematic. Currently, there are 117 described species within the Phyllocnistis genus, with only five species known to occur in the Afrotropics (De Prins & De Prins 2011–2023b): P. saligna (Zeller, 1839), P. citrella Stainton, 1856, P. pharetrucha Meyrick, 1921, P. cassiella (Ghesquière, (1940), P. loxosticha Bradley, 1965. Of these, only citrella and pharetrucha have been recorded in South Africa. This study describes three new species for the region and tentatively proposes identification keys for Afrotropical species. The forewing patterns were used because several informative diagnostic characters have recently been identified, such as colour, shape, size, and location of corresponding fasciae and strigulae (Kawahara et al. 2009; Kobayashi et al. 2011; Brito et al. 2017; Brito et al. 2019; Kirichenko et al. 2018). For a complete description of the pattern elements, refer to Brito et al. (2017). It was possible to examine the forewing pattern for all species except P. cassiella, for which only the original description was used.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14041126
Primary Topic
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phyllocnistis Zeller 1848

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
article

Phyllocnistis Zeller 1848

article en

Abstract

Phyllocnistis Zeller, 1848 The taxonomic position of this genus has long been uncertain. De Prins & Kawahara (2009) and Brito et al. (2017) conducted a thorough review of its history and pointed out that the existing taxonomic literature greatly underestimates its diversity. These moths are difficult to identify, primarily due to their small size (maximum 7 mm wingspan), a lack of distinguishing characteristics in their genitalia, and weak chitinization, which often makes interpreting abdominal structures problematic. Currently, there are 117 described species within the Phyllocnistis genus, with only five species known to occur in the Afrotropics (De Prins & De Prins 2011–2023b): P. saligna (Zeller, 1839), P. citrella Stainton, 1856, P. pharetrucha Meyrick, 1921, P. cassiella (Ghesquière, (1940), P. loxosticha Bradley, 1965. Of these, only citrella and pharetrucha have been recorded in South Africa. This study describes three new species for the region and tentatively proposes identification keys for Afrotropical species. The forewing patterns were used because several informative diagnostic characters have recently been identified, such as colour, shape, size, and location of corresponding fasciae and strigulae (Kawahara et al. 2009; Kobayashi et al. 2011; Brito et al. 2017; Brito et al. 2019; Kirichenko et al. 2018). For a complete description of the pattern elements, refer to Brito et al. (2017). It was possible to examine the forewing pattern for all species except P. cassiella, for which only the original description was used.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Université de Tours (FR), University of Verona (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Museo Civico di Zoologia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.