Canarana brachialis

Canarana brachialis (Guérin-Méneville, 1855) (Fig. 61) Hemilophus brachialis Guérin-Méneville, 1855: 600. Spathoptera brachialis; Thomson, 1878: 16. Adesmus brachialis; Aurivillius, 1923: 589. Hilarolea brachialis; Soukup, 1942: 311. Canarana brachialis; Martins & Galileo, 1992b: 443. Hilarolea croceicollis Gahan, 1889: 393. Remarks. Hemilophus brachialis was described based on a single specimen, sex not specified, from Ecuador (Napo). According to Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) and Monné (2024b) the holotype is a female. These two authors also informed that the holotype is from Ecuador (Napo: Quixos). However, there is no information in the original description indicating where the specimen was collected. Actually, Cajetano Osculati, collector of the holotype specimen, was in several places in Ecuador during his stay in that country, but also stayed in Brazil (e.g. Tabatinga, São Paulo de Olivança, Fonte Boa, Ega (currently Tefé), Manaus, Santarém, etc.) (Osculati 1854; Papavero 1973). Therefore, it is not possible to be sure even if the specimen was really collected in Ecuador. Perhaps an eventual information on the labels of the holotype may elucidate this. We did not find any information in Osculati (1854) that could indicate where the holotype of this species was collected. Later, Gahan (1889) described Hilarolea croceicollis based on a probable female from Bolivia. Martins & Galileo (1992b) synonymized H. croceicollis with Canarana brachialis. Currently, it is known from Ecuador (Napo), Peru, Brazil (Mato Grosso), and Bolivia (Chapare, Cochabamba, and Santa Cruz) (Monné 2024b; Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023). The specimen from Mato Grosso listed in Martins & Galileo (2014) is actually from Mato Grosso do Sul. Therefore, we are excluding this species from the fauna of the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso until a specimen is formally collected there. We are provisionally maintaining Ecuador as a country where this species occurs. Apparently, C. tuberculicollis Guérin-Méneville, 1855 is just a chromatic variation of C. brachialis. The color of the femora and the shade of the color of the prothorax is variable in C. brachialis. Material examined. BRAZIL, Mato Grosso do Sul: Campo Grande, 1 female (MNRJ-ENT-47643), 04.X.1978, W.W. Koller leg. (MNRJ); Rio Verde [see comment on “Rio Verde” in remarks of Oncideres malleri Fragoso, 1970], 1 female (MZSP 61261), XII.1965, A. Maller leg. (MZSP).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13621445
Primary Topic
Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canarana brachialis

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
article

Canarana brachialis

article en

Abstract

Canarana brachialis (Guérin-Méneville, 1855) (Fig. 61) Hemilophus brachialis Guérin-Méneville, 1855: 600. Spathoptera brachialis; Thomson, 1878: 16. Adesmus brachialis; Aurivillius, 1923: 589. Hilarolea brachialis; Soukup, 1942: 311. Canarana brachialis; Martins & Galileo, 1992b: 443. Hilarolea croceicollis Gahan, 1889: 393. Remarks. Hemilophus brachialis was described based on a single specimen, sex not specified, from Ecuador (Napo). According to Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) and Monné (2024b) the holotype is a female. These two authors also informed that the holotype is from Ecuador (Napo: Quixos). However, there is no information in the original description indicating where the specimen was collected. Actually, Cajetano Osculati, collector of the holotype specimen, was in several places in Ecuador during his stay in that country, but also stayed in Brazil (e.g. Tabatinga, São Paulo de Olivança, Fonte Boa, Ega (currently Tefé), Manaus, Santarém, etc.) (Osculati 1854; Papavero 1973). Therefore, it is not possible to be sure even if the specimen was really collected in Ecuador. Perhaps an eventual information on the labels of the holotype may elucidate this. We did not find any information in Osculati (1854) that could indicate where the holotype of this species was collected. Later, Gahan (1889) described Hilarolea croceicollis based on a probable female from Bolivia. Martins & Galileo (1992b) synonymized H. croceicollis with Canarana brachialis. Currently, it is known from Ecuador (Napo), Peru, Brazil (Mato Grosso), and Bolivia (Chapare, Cochabamba, and Santa Cruz) (Monné 2024b; Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023). The specimen from Mato Grosso listed in Martins & Galileo (2014) is actually from Mato Grosso do Sul. Therefore, we are excluding this species from the fauna of the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso until a specimen is formally collected there. We are provisionally maintaining Ecuador as a country where this species occurs. Apparently, C. tuberculicollis Guérin-Méneville, 1855 is just a chromatic variation of C. brachialis. The color of the femora and the shade of the color of the prothorax is variable in C. brachialis. Material examined. BRAZIL, Mato Grosso do Sul: Campo Grande, 1 female (MNRJ-ENT-47643), 04.X.1978, W.W. Koller leg. (MNRJ); Rio Verde [see comment on “Rio Verde” in remarks of Oncideres malleri Fragoso, 1970], 1 female (MZSP 61261), XII.1965, A. Maller leg. (MZSP).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.