An analysis of lexical and syntactic errors in the Urdu translation of the Punjab Textbook Board's English literature

English, a second language in Pakistan, is challenging for many intermediate learners who rely on guidebooks for Urdu translations of English literature. This study examines lexical and syntactic errors in these translations, focusing on the Dogar Publisher’s guidebook for Intermediate Part 1. Using Baker’s (1992) translation strategies, the analysis revealed significant errors at both lexical and syntactic levels. Lexically, discrepancies were observed, with some English words remaining untranslated or being inaccurately translated. Syntactically, errors were identified in sentence construction, leading to a lack of conveying the intended meaning. Additionally, certain parts of the sentences were left untranslated. To improve translated materials, publishers should prioritize precise translation, address lexical and syntactic challenges, and employ qualified translators to prevent errors that may impede exam success and hinder English proficiency. Addressing these issues is essential for improving exam performance and language skills for guidebook users.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13956423
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An analysis of lexical and syntactic errors in the Urdu translation of the Punjab Textbook Board's English literature

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

An analysis of lexical and syntactic errors in the Urdu translation of the Punjab Textbook Board's English literature

article en

Abstract

English, a second language in Pakistan, is challenging for many intermediate learners who rely on guidebooks for Urdu translations of English literature. This study examines lexical and syntactic errors in these translations, focusing on the Dogar Publisher’s guidebook for Intermediate Part 1. Using Baker’s (1992) translation strategies, the analysis revealed significant errors at both lexical and syntactic levels. Lexically, discrepancies were observed, with some English words remaining untranslated or being inaccurately translated. Syntactically, errors were identified in sentence construction, leading to a lack of conveying the intended meaning. Additionally, certain parts of the sentences were left untranslated. To improve translated materials, publishers should prioritize precise translation, address lexical and syntactic challenges, and employ qualified translators to prevent errors that may impede exam success and hinder English proficiency. Addressing these issues is essential for improving exam performance and language skills for guidebook users.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.