Abductive Analysis in Qualitative and Multi-Method Political Science

This paper introduces an abductive framework for qualitative and multimethod political science. Abduction emphasizes an iterative dialogue between theory and observation, integrating principles of deductive hypothesis formulation with inductive theory evaluation. The paper begins by outlining relevant methodological debates. It then briefly discusses the methodological foundation, techniques for generating explanatory hypotheses, and strategies for hypothesis testing in abductive analysis. The insights and examples are drawn from non-interpretivist, theory-driven qualitative political science and sociology interested in causal explanation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14062835
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abductive Analysis in Qualitative and Multi-Method Political Science

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Abductive Analysis in Qualitative and Multi-Method Political Science

article en

Abstract

This paper introduces an abductive framework for qualitative and multimethod political science. Abduction emphasizes an iterative dialogue between theory and observation, integrating principles of deductive hypothesis formulation with inductive theory evaluation. The paper begins by outlining relevant methodological debates. It then briefly discusses the methodological foundation, techniques for generating explanatory hypotheses, and strategies for hypothesis testing in abductive analysis. The insights and examples are drawn from non-interpretivist, theory-driven qualitative political science and sociology interested in causal explanation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Chicago (US), University of Chicago Research Bangladesh (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.