Scaphomonus Viraktamath 2009

Key to species (males) of Scaphomonus 1. Aedeagus with pair of spine-like apical processes (Fig. 2E–F); style with apophysis longer than section of shank based of lateral lobe (Fig. 2G) (Sarawak, Sabah) .................. S. bispinosus sp. nov. – Aedeagus without pair of spine-like apical processes; style with apophysis shorter than section of shank based of lateral lobe ................................................................................................................ 2 2. Aedeagus with very long and narrow apically bifid shaft (Fig. 1A); basal apodeme long (Fig. 1B) (India) ............................................................................. S. arcuatus (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993) – Aedeagus with shaft and basal apodeme short to long; apex of shaft not bifid ................................ 3 3. Aedeagus with shaft long, curved posteriorly; basal apodeme longer than half length of shaft (Fig. 1D) ........................................................................................... S. vateriae (Viraktamath, 2009) – Aedeagus with shaft short to moderately long, curved dorsally; basal apodeme half or less that half length of shaft ................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Aedeagal processes directed caudally (Fig. 1E); basal apodeme comprising two diverging basal arms (Fig. 1F) (China) ................................................................................. S. widestyleus (Li, 2011) – Aedeagal processes directed towards base of aedeagus in lateral view; basal apodeme not comprising two diverging basal arms .................................................................................................................. 5 5. Aedeagus with two pair of apical processes (Fig. 1G–H) (India) ...................................................... .................................................................................... S. quadrifidus (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993) – Aedeagus with a single pair of apical processes ............................................................................... 6 6. Pygofer with caudal process absent; connective with stem much longer than arms (India) .............. ........................................................................................... S. freytagi (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993) – Pygofer with caudal process present; connective stem shorter to slightly longer than arms ............ 7 7. Pygofer process strongly curved dorsally; connective stem slightly longer than arms (India) .......... .............................................................................................................. S. redundans (Distant, 1918) – Pygofer process not strongly curved dorsally; connective stem shorter than arms .......................... 8 8. Base of aedeagus broad in lateral (Fig. 1N), processes broad in ventral view (Fig. 1D) (India) ........................................................................ S. malnadicus (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993) – Base of aedeagus narrow in lateral view (Fig. 1P), processes narrow in posterior view (Fig. 1O) (India) ........................................................................ S. agumbensis (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993)

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15474747
Primary Topic
Crustacean biology and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaphomonus Viraktamath 2009

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Crustacean biology and ecology
article

Scaphomonus Viraktamath 2009

article en

Abstract

Key to species (males) of Scaphomonus 1. Aedeagus with pair of spine-like apical processes (Fig. 2E–F); style with apophysis longer than section of shank based of lateral lobe (Fig. 2G) (Sarawak, Sabah) .................. S. bispinosus sp. nov. – Aedeagus without pair of spine-like apical processes; style with apophysis shorter than section of shank based of lateral lobe ................................................................................................................ 2 2. Aedeagus with very long and narrow apically bifid shaft (Fig. 1A); basal apodeme long (Fig. 1B) (India) ............................................................................. S. arcuatus (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993) – Aedeagus with shaft and basal apodeme short to long; apex of shaft not bifid ................................ 3 3. Aedeagus with shaft long, curved posteriorly; basal apodeme longer than half length of shaft (Fig. 1D) ........................................................................................... S. vateriae (Viraktamath, 2009) – Aedeagus with shaft short to moderately long, curved dorsally; basal apodeme half or less that half length of shaft ................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Aedeagal processes directed caudally (Fig. 1E); basal apodeme comprising two diverging basal arms (Fig. 1F) (China) ................................................................................. S. widestyleus (Li, 2011) – Aedeagal processes directed towards base of aedeagus in lateral view; basal apodeme not comprising two diverging basal arms .................................................................................................................. 5 5. Aedeagus with two pair of apical processes (Fig. 1G–H) (India) ...................................................... .................................................................................... S. quadrifidus (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993) – Aedeagus with a single pair of apical processes ............................................................................... 6 6. Pygofer with caudal process absent; connective with stem much longer than arms (India) .............. ........................................................................................... S. freytagi (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993) – Pygofer with caudal process present; connective stem shorter to slightly longer than arms ............ 7 7. Pygofer process strongly curved dorsally; connective stem slightly longer than arms (India) .......... .............................................................................................................. S. redundans (Distant, 1918) – Pygofer process not strongly curved dorsally; connective stem shorter than arms .......................... 8 8. Base of aedeagus broad in lateral (Fig. 1N), processes broad in ventral view (Fig. 1D) (India) ........................................................................ S. malnadicus (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993) – Base of aedeagus narrow in lateral view (Fig. 1P), processes narrow in posterior view (Fig. 1O) (India) ........................................................................ S. agumbensis (Viraktamath & Mohan, 1993)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Natural History Museum (GB), Ministry of Agriculture (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Crustacean biology and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.