A Prospective Clinical Study of Duodenal Perforation

Background: Duodenal perforation is a surgical emergency with high morbidity and mortality if not managed promptly. It commonly results from perforated peptic ulcers, often associated with habits like smoking and alcohol consumption. Early diagnosis and intervention are critical to improving outcomes. Aim and Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation, risk factors, radiological findings, intraoperative findings, complications, and outcomes of patients with duodenal perforation. Materials and Methods: This prospective clinical study was conducted on 65 patients diagnosed with duodenal perforation at a tertiary care hospital. Demographic data, clinical history, habits, radiological findings, site and size of perforation, complications, hospital stay, and outcomes were recorded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The majority of patients (47.7%) belonged to the 41–50 years age group, with a male predominance (69.2%). Smoking and alcohol habits were significant risk factors (32.3%). Abdominal pain (66.2%) was the most common symptom. Pneumoperitoneum on X-ray (66.2%) and free fluid on CT (73.8%) were key diagnostic findings. The first part of the duodenum was the most common site of perforation (81.5%). Postoperative complications included wound infection (13.8%) and sepsis (6.2%). Mortality was 4.6%, and 80% of patients had a smooth recovery. Conclusion: Duodenal perforation predominantly affects middle-aged males with modifiable risk factors. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention significantly reduce morbidity and mortality.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14591585
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective Clinical Study of Duodenal Perforation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

A Prospective Clinical Study of Duodenal Perforation

article en

Abstract

Background: Duodenal perforation is a surgical emergency with high morbidity and mortality if not managed promptly. It commonly results from perforated peptic ulcers, often associated with habits like smoking and alcohol consumption. Early diagnosis and intervention are critical to improving outcomes. Aim and Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation, risk factors, radiological findings, intraoperative findings, complications, and outcomes of patients with duodenal perforation. Materials and Methods: This prospective clinical study was conducted on 65 patients diagnosed with duodenal perforation at a tertiary care hospital. Demographic data, clinical history, habits, radiological findings, site and size of perforation, complications, hospital stay, and outcomes were recorded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The majority of patients (47.7%) belonged to the 41–50 years age group, with a male predominance (69.2%). Smoking and alcohol habits were significant risk factors (32.3%). Abdominal pain (66.2%) was the most common symptom. Pneumoperitoneum on X-ray (66.2%) and free fluid on CT (73.8%) were key diagnostic findings. The first part of the duodenum was the most common site of perforation (81.5%). Postoperative complications included wound infection (13.8%) and sepsis (6.2%). Mortality was 4.6%, and 80% of patients had a smooth recovery. Conclusion: Duodenal perforation predominantly affects middle-aged males with modifiable risk factors. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention significantly reduce morbidity and mortality.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Government Medical College (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.