AI Enhancement and the Right of Integrity – Rehashing the 1980s Colorization Debate

With the rise and prominence of AI art and its profitability, it is clear that production companies and streaming platforms such as Netflix or Amazon Prime will look to ‘enhance’ works to which they own the rights, using those tools. While a plethora of works regarding AI in the IP space has been written recently when discussing authorship, and granting AI a legal personality, moral rights are often brushed over. Despite the novelty of AI tools, there is a long history of technological enhancements made on films with little legal resolution under Anglo-American legal systems. Therefore, this paper will, through a historical study of the colorization conflict in the US during the 1980s and its failure to provide directors with a satisfactory right, and through comparison with Continental European jurisdictions with a stronger moral rights tradition, seek to reform the right of integrity in light of this practice. However, it will also consider a balance between protecting directors from unnecessary AI enhancements to their films and the encouragement of the use of AI tools to efficiently restore films which would otherwise remain lost. This working paper is a part of the "Outstanding LLM Dissertations 2024".

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14196262
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Enhancement and the Right of Integrity – Rehashing the 1980s Colorization Debate

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

AI Enhancement and the Right of Integrity – Rehashing the 1980s Colorization Debate

article en

Abstract

With the rise and prominence of AI art and its profitability, it is clear that production companies and streaming platforms such as Netflix or Amazon Prime will look to ‘enhance’ works to which they own the rights, using those tools. While a plethora of works regarding AI in the IP space has been written recently when discussing authorship, and granting AI a legal personality, moral rights are often brushed over. Despite the novelty of AI tools, there is a long history of technological enhancements made on films with little legal resolution under Anglo-American legal systems. Therefore, this paper will, through a historical study of the colorization conflict in the US during the 1980s and its failure to provide directors with a satisfactory right, and through comparison with Continental European jurisdictions with a stronger moral rights tradition, seek to reform the right of integrity in light of this practice. However, it will also consider a balance between protecting directors from unnecessary AI enhancements to their films and the encouragement of the use of AI tools to efficiently restore films which would otherwise remain lost. This working paper is a part of the "Outstanding LLM Dissertations 2024".

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.