Pembaharuan Pengaturan Hukum Pidana Justice Collaborator Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia

The law always moves dynamically following changes and developments over time in the concept of criminal law reform. The large number of organized criminal acts ultimately gave rise to the idea of perpetrators working together (Justice Collaborator). The legal basis governing Justice Collaborators is contained in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims; and Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 4 of 2011 concerning Treatment of Criminal Whistleblowers and Justice Collaborators. In Certain Criminal Cases. In cases where the defendant wants to apply for status as a Justice Collaborator, even defendants who have already obtained status as a Justice Collaborator receive unfair treatment due to the legal vacuum of this legal basis. This legal vacuum makes the author want to research how indicators a person can be categorized as a Justice Collaborator in accordance with Indonesian positive law, what is the ideal concept of Justice Collaborator arrangements for perpetrators of criminal acts in Indonesia. The aim of this research is to explain the indicators that a person can be categorized as a Justice Collaborator and to formulate an ideal concept for regulating Justice Collaborators for perpetrators of criminal acts in Indonesia. This type of research is normative juridical, that is, legal research is carried out by examining library materials. The results of this research are the Justice Collaborator indicators in SEMA Number 4 of 2011, namely being aware of their mistakes and admitting to criminal acts, not being the main perpetrator, being cooperative and providing clear information, uncovering criminal acts effectively or uncovering other perpetrators, and the Public Prosecutor The lawsuit states the role that the perpetrator has been assigned. As the legal basis regarding Justice Collaborator still has deficiencies based on cases in Indonesia, the researcher provides an ideal concept, namely that there are deficiencies in the regulations regarding "Main Actors", there is no certainty that Justice Collaborator will receive an award. In the future, there needs to be clarity regarding the indicators for someone to get Justice Collaborator and updates regarding laws and regulations regarding Justice Collaborator.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14565671
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pembaharuan Pengaturan Hukum Pidana Justice Collaborator Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Pembaharuan Pengaturan Hukum Pidana Justice Collaborator Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia

article en

Abstract

The law always moves dynamically following changes and developments over time in the concept of criminal law reform. The large number of organized criminal acts ultimately gave rise to the idea of perpetrators working together (Justice Collaborator). The legal basis governing Justice Collaborators is contained in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims; and Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 4 of 2011 concerning Treatment of Criminal Whistleblowers and Justice Collaborators. In Certain Criminal Cases. In cases where the defendant wants to apply for status as a Justice Collaborator, even defendants who have already obtained status as a Justice Collaborator receive unfair treatment due to the legal vacuum of this legal basis. This legal vacuum makes the author want to research how indicators a person can be categorized as a Justice Collaborator in accordance with Indonesian positive law, what is the ideal concept of Justice Collaborator arrangements for perpetrators of criminal acts in Indonesia. The aim of this research is to explain the indicators that a person can be categorized as a Justice Collaborator and to formulate an ideal concept for regulating Justice Collaborators for perpetrators of criminal acts in Indonesia. This type of research is normative juridical, that is, legal research is carried out by examining library materials. The results of this research are the Justice Collaborator indicators in SEMA Number 4 of 2011, namely being aware of their mistakes and admitting to criminal acts, not being the main perpetrator, being cooperative and providing clear information, uncovering criminal acts effectively or uncovering other perpetrators, and the Public Prosecutor The lawsuit states the role that the perpetrator has been assigned. As the legal basis regarding Justice Collaborator still has deficiencies based on cases in Indonesia, the researcher provides an ideal concept, namely that there are deficiencies in the regulations regarding "Main Actors", there is no certainty that Justice Collaborator will receive an award. In the future, there needs to be clarity regarding the indicators for someone to get Justice Collaborator and updates regarding laws and regulations regarding Justice Collaborator.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Riau University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.