Open evaluation of research-related activities - practical considerations

Abstract: This repo contains materials related to a presentation given on 5 September 2024 at the University of Pisa as part of the Annual Meeting 2024 of the Gruppo Telecomunicazioni e Tecnologie dell'Informazione (GTTI). Abstract: The complex nature of the research landscape provides ample opportunities to evaluate specific contributions, yet doing so in a way that spans across multiple contexts is challenging. Opening up this landscape tends to complicate the picture even further. Prevailing evaluation paradigms of research-related activities are strongly biased towards certain types of contributions, and they lack transparency and alignment with societal needs. Such evaluation workflows can be opened up in various ways too, and this talk will zoom in on practical aspects of that from the perspective of multiple stakeholders in the research landscape. While the slides are mostly in English, there are a few comments in Italian sprinkled in; they are referring to elements of the preceding presentation by Marco Malgarini (ANVUR) in the same session.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13673400
Primary Topic
Educational Tools and Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open evaluation of research-related activities - practical considerations

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Educational Tools and Methods
article

Open evaluation of research-related activities - practical considerations

article en

Abstract

Abstract: This repo contains materials related to a presentation given on 5 September 2024 at the University of Pisa as part of the Annual Meeting 2024 of the Gruppo Telecomunicazioni e Tecnologie dell'Informazione (GTTI). Abstract: The complex nature of the research landscape provides ample opportunities to evaluate specific contributions, yet doing so in a way that spans across multiple contexts is challenging. Opening up this landscape tends to complicate the picture even further. Prevailing evaluation paradigms of research-related activities are strongly biased towards certain types of contributions, and they lack transparency and alignment with societal needs. Such evaluation workflows can be opened up in various ways too, and this talk will zoom in on practical aspects of that from the perspective of multiple stakeholders in the research landscape. While the slides are mostly in English, there are a few comments in Italian sprinkled in; they are referring to elements of the preceding presentation by Marco Malgarini (ANVUR) in the same session.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Educational Tools and Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.