Development of Natural Language Processing-Based Descriptive Answer Evaluation Platform (Gradescriptive)

The manual method of descriptive answer evaluation inherently comes with a lot of problems like the stressful nature of the task, the subjectivity of the grading process as well as the delayed delivery of results. This research involved the development of a computer-based test platform utilizing Natural Language Processing (NLP) as a transformative solution for evaluating descriptive answer examinations. The motivation for this project are the issues of slow turnaround times, potential bias, and limited scalability faced in the manual method of evaluating descriptive answers. Leveraging a state-of-the-art large language model, the MERN (MongoDB, Express.js, React.js and Node.js) stack and Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), a system that meticulously analyzes student responses using criteria like textual semantic similarity, keyword matching and answer length, was developed. The results of the project include timely and accurate feedback, alleviating anxieties and uncertainties around students’ performances. It showed that descriptive questions can evaluate students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, unlike objective tests. Meanwhile, lecturers are relieved of the immense stress associated with traditional manual grading, fostering a more positive and productive learning environment.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13578869
Primary Topic
Edcuational Technology Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Natural Language Processing-Based Descriptive Answer Evaluation Platform (Gradescriptive)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Edcuational Technology Systems
article

Development of Natural Language Processing-Based Descriptive Answer Evaluation Platform (Gradescriptive)

article en

Abstract

The manual method of descriptive answer evaluation inherently comes with a lot of problems like the stressful nature of the task, the subjectivity of the grading process as well as the delayed delivery of results. This research involved the development of a computer-based test platform utilizing Natural Language Processing (NLP) as a transformative solution for evaluating descriptive answer examinations. The motivation for this project are the issues of slow turnaround times, potential bias, and limited scalability faced in the manual method of evaluating descriptive answers. Leveraging a state-of-the-art large language model, the MERN (MongoDB, Express.js, React.js and Node.js) stack and Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), a system that meticulously analyzes student responses using criteria like textual semantic similarity, keyword matching and answer length, was developed. The results of the project include timely and accurate feedback, alleviating anxieties and uncertainties around students’ performances. It showed that descriptive questions can evaluate students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, unlike objective tests. Meanwhile, lecturers are relieved of the immense stress associated with traditional manual grading, fostering a more positive and productive learning environment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Edcuational Technology Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.