The Impact of Double Standards on the Effectiveness of U.S. Global Leadership

This study examines the concept of double standards in the United States (U.S.) foreign policy. It discovers how such standards undermine the effectiveness of U.S. global leadership. The analysis begins with a historical overview and theoretical framework, followed by case studies illustrating how double standards manifest in practice. They are traced particularly in the U.S. response to human rights violations, military interventions, and trade policies. The study explores the consequences of double standards on U.S. credibility and trust among allies and adversaries. It argues that perceived hypocrisy complicates efforts to reach multilateral agreements and fosters domestic backlash. It concludes with policy recommendations that emphasize the need for consistent application of principles, transparent decision-making, and strengthening of multilateral engagement.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13731703
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Double Standards on the Effectiveness of U.S. Global Leadership

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The Impact of Double Standards on the Effectiveness of U.S. Global Leadership

article en

Abstract

This study examines the concept of double standards in the United States (U.S.) foreign policy. It discovers how such standards undermine the effectiveness of U.S. global leadership. The analysis begins with a historical overview and theoretical framework, followed by case studies illustrating how double standards manifest in practice. They are traced particularly in the U.S. response to human rights violations, military interventions, and trade policies. The study explores the consequences of double standards on U.S. credibility and trust among allies and adversaries. It argues that perceived hypocrisy complicates efforts to reach multilateral agreements and fosters domestic backlash. It concludes with policy recommendations that emphasize the need for consistent application of principles, transparent decision-making, and strengthening of multilateral engagement.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.