GNSS AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION USING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH

In an effort to increase positioning accuracy in difficult circumstances, this study examined the use of machine learning (ML) approaches to improve GNSS ambiguity resolution. Performance indicators, such MSE, RMSE, MAE, and R2, were used to assess two machine learning models: K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT). GBDT achieved R2 score of 1.00, the lowest MSE (0.000 meters), RMSE (0.0010 meters), and MAE (0.0007 meters) from the training phase, making it the best performance. With an MSE of 0.000 meters, an RMSE of 0.0049 meters, a MAE of 0.0031 meters, and a R2 of 1.00, KNN also demonstrated impressive performance. GBDT maintained its exceptional accuracy throughout the testing phase, with an MSE of 0.000 meters, RMSE of 0.0010 meters, MAE of 0.0007 meters, and an R2 of 1.00. KNN performed competitively, with an MSE of 0.000 meters, RMSE of 0.0050 meters, MAE of 0.0032 meters, and R2 of 1.00. These comprehensive results demonstrate the usefulness of machine learning approaches, notably GBDT and KNN, in greatly enhancing GNSS ambiguity resolution. Such developments are critical for overcoming the obstacles given by urban canyons, dense vegetation, and other obscuring settings that have previously hampered GNSS location technologies.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14001389
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GNSS AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION USING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
article

GNSS AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION USING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH

article en

Abstract

In an effort to increase positioning accuracy in difficult circumstances, this study examined the use of machine learning (ML) approaches to improve GNSS ambiguity resolution. Performance indicators, such MSE, RMSE, MAE, and R2, were used to assess two machine learning models: K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT). GBDT achieved R2 score of 1.00, the lowest MSE (0.000 meters), RMSE (0.0010 meters), and MAE (0.0007 meters) from the training phase, making it the best performance. With an MSE of 0.000 meters, an RMSE of 0.0049 meters, a MAE of 0.0031 meters, and a R2 of 1.00, KNN also demonstrated impressive performance. GBDT maintained its exceptional accuracy throughout the testing phase, with an MSE of 0.000 meters, RMSE of 0.0010 meters, MAE of 0.0007 meters, and an R2 of 1.00. KNN performed competitively, with an MSE of 0.000 meters, RMSE of 0.0050 meters, MAE of 0.0032 meters, and R2 of 1.00. These comprehensive results demonstrate the usefulness of machine learning approaches, notably GBDT and KNN, in greatly enhancing GNSS ambiguity resolution. Such developments are critical for overcoming the obstacles given by urban canyons, dense vegetation, and other obscuring settings that have previously hampered GNSS location technologies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

GNSS AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION USING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS