Andrena (Hoplandrena) subspinigera Cockerell 1917

11. Andrena (Hoplandrena) subspinigera Cockerell, 1917 * Andrena subspinigera Cockerell, 1917: 284, ♀ [Pakistan, USNM, examined by photograph]. Listed by Meena & Dey (2019). Type material Syntype (examined by photograph) PAKISTAN • 1 ♀; Menserah [Mansehra]; 1–31 Mar. 1906; F. Benton leg.; type no. 23136; USNM. Other material examined INDIA • 1 ♀; Uttarakhand, Chopta; 2874 m a.s.l.; 6 Mar. 2021; R.K. Gautam leg.; WII. PAKISTAN • 4 ♀♀; Azad Kashmir, Paras, Shogran; 25 May 2019; M. Kafka leg.; OÖLM / TJWC. Remarks Andrena subspinigera was described from Mansehra in what is now north-western Pakistan in the foothills of the Himalayas. Cockerell drew comparison with A. spinigera (Kirby, 1802) [= A. trimmerana (Kirby, 1802), see Wood et al. 2022], but considered the two taxa distinct. It was possible to generate a barcode sequence from a specimen collected 40 km north-east of the locus typicus (Shogran). Genetically, A. subspinigera is well differentiated from A. trimmerana, and instead is closest to A. nuptialis Pérez, 1902 (Fig. 11), though is clearly distinct with a genetic distance of 8.50% (range 8.37–8.63%). It is important to note that the type material of A. subspinigera has the discs of T1–2 almost entirely red-marked, whereas in our examined material, only the marginal areas of T1–2 and a narrow strip immediately anterior to the margins are lightened dull reddish. This is considered to represent variation, as members of the subgenus Hoplandrena Pérez, 1890 are well known for extensive variation in their tergal colouration, leading to the creation of a large number of synonyms (e.g., Gusenleitner & Schwarz 2002; Wood et al. 2022; Wood 2023a). Meena & Dey (2019) listed A. subspinigera from central India, but provided no supporting evidence. We consider the presence of A. subspinigera in central India unlikely, since all confirmed records come from the Himalayas or close to them, and therefore our records represent the first confirmed records of the species in India. Distribution India * (Uttarakhand) and Pakistan (Cockerell 1917).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13644250
Primary Topic
Fossil Insects in Amber
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Andrena (Hoplandrena) subspinigera Cockerell 1917

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fossil Insects in Amber
article

Andrena (Hoplandrena) subspinigera Cockerell 1917

article en

Abstract

11. Andrena (Hoplandrena) subspinigera Cockerell, 1917 * Andrena subspinigera Cockerell, 1917: 284, ♀ [Pakistan, USNM, examined by photograph]. Listed by Meena & Dey (2019). Type material Syntype (examined by photograph) PAKISTAN • 1 ♀; Menserah [Mansehra]; 1–31 Mar. 1906; F. Benton leg.; type no. 23136; USNM. Other material examined INDIA • 1 ♀; Uttarakhand, Chopta; 2874 m a.s.l.; 6 Mar. 2021; R.K. Gautam leg.; WII. PAKISTAN • 4 ♀♀; Azad Kashmir, Paras, Shogran; 25 May 2019; M. Kafka leg.; OÖLM / TJWC. Remarks Andrena subspinigera was described from Mansehra in what is now north-western Pakistan in the foothills of the Himalayas. Cockerell drew comparison with A. spinigera (Kirby, 1802) [= A. trimmerana (Kirby, 1802), see Wood et al. 2022], but considered the two taxa distinct. It was possible to generate a barcode sequence from a specimen collected 40 km north-east of the locus typicus (Shogran). Genetically, A. subspinigera is well differentiated from A. trimmerana, and instead is closest to A. nuptialis Pérez, 1902 (Fig. 11), though is clearly distinct with a genetic distance of 8.50% (range 8.37–8.63%). It is important to note that the type material of A. subspinigera has the discs of T1–2 almost entirely red-marked, whereas in our examined material, only the marginal areas of T1–2 and a narrow strip immediately anterior to the margins are lightened dull reddish. This is considered to represent variation, as members of the subgenus Hoplandrena Pérez, 1890 are well known for extensive variation in their tergal colouration, leading to the creation of a large number of synonyms (e.g., Gusenleitner & Schwarz 2002; Wood et al. 2022; Wood 2023a). Meena & Dey (2019) listed A. subspinigera from central India, but provided no supporting evidence. We consider the presence of A. subspinigera in central India unlikely, since all confirmed records come from the Himalayas or close to them, and therefore our records represent the first confirmed records of the species in India. Distribution India * (Uttarakhand) and Pakistan (Cockerell 1917).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL), Graphic Era University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Fossil Insects in Amber
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.