Analysis of Formative and Summative Evaluation Implementation in Physics Learning Process at MA Masyariqul Anwar

Evaluation in the learning process plays an important role in assessing students' competency achievement. Formative and summative evaluations are two main approaches in assessing the effectiveness of learning. This study aims to analyze the implementation of formative and summative evaluations in physics learning at MA Masyariqul Anwar. The research method used is a qualitative method with a case study approach. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and document analysis. The results of the study indicate that formative evaluation is implemented in the form of quizzes, discussions, and individual assignments, while summative evaluation is carried out through midterm and final exams. The obstacles faced include time constraints in implementing formative evaluation and lack of student readiness in facing summative evaluation. This study recommends increasing teacher training in formative evaluation and optimizing learning time to improve assessment quality.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52647/jep.v7i1.271
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Formative and Summative Evaluation Implementation in Physics Learning Process at MA Masyariqul Anwar

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Educational Methods and Outcomes
article

Analysis of Formative and Summative Evaluation Implementation in Physics Learning Process at MA Masyariqul Anwar

article en

Abstract

Evaluation in the learning process plays an important role in assessing students' competency achievement. Formative and summative evaluations are two main approaches in assessing the effectiveness of learning. This study aims to analyze the implementation of formative and summative evaluations in physics learning at MA Masyariqul Anwar. The research method used is a qualitative method with a case study approach. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and document analysis. The results of the study indicate that formative evaluation is implemented in the form of quizzes, discussions, and individual assignments, while summative evaluation is carried out through midterm and final exams. The obstacles faced include time constraints in implementing formative evaluation and lack of student readiness in facing summative evaluation. This study recommends increasing teacher training in formative evaluation and optimizing learning time to improve assessment quality.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Kalbe (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Educational Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of Formative and Summative Evaluation Implementation in Physics Learning Process at MA Masyariqul Anwar · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS