Evaluating growth references used in Switzerland: a comparative analysis in Zurich schoolchildren

INTRODUCTION: The Swiss Society of Paediatrics currently recommends the growth references of the World Health Organization (WHO), while the Paediatric Endocrinology Centre Zurich (PEZZ) has proposed alternative growth references. Specialists and researchers also use International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) references to define overweight and obesity. We investigated the fit of anthropometric measurements from schoolchildren in the canton of Zurich to these three growth references and assessed the prevalence of overweight, obesity and short stature across the three references. METHODS: We analysed data from 3755 children aged 6–17 years in the cross-sectional LuftiBus in the School (LUIS) study, collected in the period 2013–2016 in the canton of Zurich. We calculated z-scores of height, weight and body mass index (BMI) based on WHO, PEZZ and IOTF references. We compared the mean and distribution of z-scores to the expected standard normal distribution using the Anderson-Darling test. We classified overweight, obesity and severe obesity based on cutoff values given by the three references. We defined short stature as <3rd percentile of height for age. RESULTS: The mean z-scores in LUIS were 0.56 for height, 0.28 for weight and 0.06 for BMI based on WHO references; 0.15 for height, 0.06 for weight and −0.01 for BMI based on PEZZ references; and 0.19 for BMI based on IOTF references. The Anderson-Darling test showed that children in LUIS fit worse to WHO and IOTF than to PEZZ references. The WHO classified fewer children as overweight than PEZZ and IOTF references (WHO: 8%; PEZZ: 15%; IOTF: 13%) but more children as obese or severely obese (6%; 4%; 3%). The WHO defined fewer children as being of short stature than PEZZ references (1% vs 3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that anthropometric data of schoolchildren in Zurich (LUIS) differ notably from WHO and IOTF references potentially leading to misclassification of overweight, obesity and short stature. Thus it would be timely to develop new nationally representative growth references for Switzerland.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-278244
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating growth references used in Switzerland: a comparative analysis in Zurich schoolchildren

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Evaluating growth references used in Switzerland: a comparative analysis in Zurich schoolchildren

article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Swiss Society of Paediatrics currently recommends the growth references of the World Health Organization (WHO), while the Paediatric Endocrinology Centre Zurich (PEZZ) has proposed alternative growth references. Specialists and researchers also use International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) references to define overweight and obesity. We investigated the fit of anthropometric measurements from schoolchildren in the canton of Zurich to these three growth references and assessed the prevalence of overweight, obesity and short stature across the three references. METHODS: We analysed data from 3755 children aged 6–17 years in the cross-sectional LuftiBus in the School (LUIS) study, collected in the period 2013–2016 in the canton of Zurich. We calculated z-scores of height, weight and body mass index (BMI) based on WHO, PEZZ and IOTF references. We compared the mean and distribution of z-scores to the expected standard normal distribution using the Anderson-Darling test. We classified overweight, obesity and severe obesity based on cutoff values given by the three references. We defined short stature as <3rd percentile of height for age. RESULTS: The mean z-scores in LUIS were 0.56 for height, 0.28 for weight and 0.06 for BMI based on WHO references; 0.15 for height, 0.06 for weight and −0.01 for BMI based on PEZZ references; and 0.19 for BMI based on IOTF references. The Anderson-Darling test showed that children in LUIS fit worse to WHO and IOTF than to PEZZ references. The WHO classified fewer children as overweight than PEZZ and IOTF references (WHO: 8%; PEZZ: 15%; IOTF: 13%) but more children as obese or severely obese (6%; 4%; 3%). The WHO defined fewer children as being of short stature than PEZZ references (1% vs 3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that anthropometric data of schoolchildren in Zurich (LUIS) differ notably from WHO and IOTF references potentially leading to misclassification of overweight, obesity and short stature. Thus it would be timely to develop new nationally representative growth references for Switzerland.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating growth references used in Switzerland: a comparative analysis in Zurich schoolchildren · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS