Early postinterventional clinical implications of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum injection versus limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease.

Objectives This study compared Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) injection and limited fasciectomy (LF) in terms of early post-interventional soft tissue conditions and patient burden, evaluated by visit frequency to surgeons and hand therapists, complications, and reintervention rates.Materials And Methods Consecutive patients undergoing CCH injection or LF as first-line treatment for Dupuytren's disease over 15 years were assessed. Propensity score matching minimized selection bias. The primary outcome was the assessment of early post-interventional (between 2 and 8 weeks) soft tissue condition using a novel Soft Tissue Score with points assigned for documented swelling, hyperemia, induration, and tenderness. Secondary outcomes included the number of surgeon and hand therapy visits, as well as the complication and reintervention rates in a subgroup of patients followed for at least 4 months.Results After propensity score matching, two treatment groups of 26 patients each were formed (CCH vs. LF group). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and correction of flexion contracture between the two treatment groups. The early postinterventional Soft Tissue Score was significantly worse in the LF group than in the CCH group (mean 1.35 vs. 0.65 points, MD 0.7, 95 % CI [0.2, 1.2], p = 0.022). The number of surgeon and hand therapy visits was significantly higher in the LF group (mean 4.7 vs. 1.9 visits, MD 2.8, 95 % CI [1.8, 3.8], p < 0.001 and mean 10.5 vs. 4.3 visits, MD 6.2, 95 % CI [0.7, 11.7], p = 0.036, respectively). The rate of mild and severe complications was comparable in both groups. While the reintervention rate was significantly higher in the CCH group, the occurrence of multiple reinterventions was comparable.Conclusion The results of this study suggest that CCH injections lead to less complicated wound healing requiring less intensive surgeon and hand therapy aftercare than LF. CCH represents a valuable addition to Dupuytren's disease treatment, allowing for repeated use in severe, complex, or recurrent cases without increasing procedure-related risks while offering versatility for combination with minimally invasive surgery.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/88362
Primary Topic
Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early postinterventional clinical implications of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum injection versus limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
article

Early postinterventional clinical implications of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum injection versus limited fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease.

article en

Abstract

Objectives This study compared Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) injection and limited fasciectomy (LF) in terms of early post-interventional soft tissue conditions and patient burden, evaluated by visit frequency to surgeons and hand therapists, complications, and reintervention rates.Materials And Methods Consecutive patients undergoing CCH injection or LF as first-line treatment for Dupuytren's disease over 15 years were assessed. Propensity score matching minimized selection bias. The primary outcome was the assessment of early post-interventional (between 2 and 8 weeks) soft tissue condition using a novel Soft Tissue Score with points assigned for documented swelling, hyperemia, induration, and tenderness. Secondary outcomes included the number of surgeon and hand therapy visits, as well as the complication and reintervention rates in a subgroup of patients followed for at least 4 months.Results After propensity score matching, two treatment groups of 26 patients each were formed (CCH vs. LF group). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and correction of flexion contracture between the two treatment groups. The early postinterventional Soft Tissue Score was significantly worse in the LF group than in the CCH group (mean 1.35 vs. 0.65 points, MD 0.7, 95 % CI [0.2, 1.2], p = 0.022). The number of surgeon and hand therapy visits was significantly higher in the LF group (mean 4.7 vs. 1.9 visits, MD 2.8, 95 % CI [1.8, 3.8], p < 0.001 and mean 10.5 vs. 4.3 visits, MD 6.2, 95 % CI [0.7, 11.7], p = 0.036, respectively). The rate of mild and severe complications was comparable in both groups. While the reintervention rate was significantly higher in the CCH group, the occurrence of multiple reinterventions was comparable.Conclusion The results of this study suggest that CCH injections lead to less complicated wound healing requiring less intensive surgeon and hand therapy aftercare than LF. CCH represents a valuable addition to Dupuytren's disease treatment, allowing for repeated use in severe, complex, or recurrent cases without increasing procedure-related risks while offering versatility for combination with minimally invasive surgery.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Plastic Surgery Hospital (CN), Hand and Upper Limb Clinic (CA), Aesthetic Surgery Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.