Situated Smartness

Under the guise of technological progress, smart city frameworks render themselves increasingly inadequate in addressing communal needs as they so-often rely on extractive techniques of surveillance capitalism. Communitas: Means of Livelihood and Ways of Life (1947) by Percival and Paul Goodman offers a critique of consumerist society and proposes a form of visionary, techno-socialist planning principles. Juxtaposed with contemporary critiques of smart urbanism—particularly its emphasis on efficiency, data-driven governance, and technological optimization at the expense of public space—Communitas offers a valuable perspective on participatory planning. Smart systems have often emerged from the well-known Silicon Valley imaginary, where scalability, control, and productivity dominate. A critical-propositional framework is introduced and focuses on addressing two dimensions of future urbanism: energy infrastructure and public participation. The article cites Taiwanese digital governance as an example to synergize technological innovation and democratic planning in the development of more just urban futures.

Publication Details

Journal
Wise Thorough / Urban Creativity Journals
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48619/vas.v1i1.1208
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Situated Smartness

Wise Thorough / Urban Creativity Journals
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Situated Smartness

article en

Abstract

Under the guise of technological progress, smart city frameworks render themselves increasingly inadequate in addressing communal needs as they so-often rely on extractive techniques of surveillance capitalism. Communitas: Means of Livelihood and Ways of Life (1947) by Percival and Paul Goodman offers a critique of consumerist society and proposes a form of visionary, techno-socialist planning principles. Juxtaposed with contemporary critiques of smart urbanism—particularly its emphasis on efficiency, data-driven governance, and technological optimization at the expense of public space—Communitas offers a valuable perspective on participatory planning. Smart systems have often emerged from the well-known Silicon Valley imaginary, where scalability, control, and productivity dominate. A critical-propositional framework is introduced and focuses on addressing two dimensions of future urbanism: energy infrastructure and public participation. The article cites Taiwanese digital governance as an example to synergize technological innovation and democratic planning in the development of more just urban futures.

Wise Thorough / Urban Creativity Journals
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.