Comparing Tibiofemoral Rotation Measurements Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability

Background: Tibiofemoral rotation is an emerging parameter, especially in assessing patellofemoral instability. However, reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality and do not consider the effect of knee flexion during image acquisition. Purpose: To analyze the differences in tibiofemoral rotation measurements between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 78 knees in 72 patients were included. All patients underwent surgery for patellofemoral instability at our institution and preoperative CT and MRI were available. Tibiofemoral rotation was measured on axial CT and MRI, whereas the respective knee flexion angle (KFA) was measured on sagittal images. Tibiofemoral rotation values in which the tibia was externally rotated to the femur were handled as positive values. Differences between CT and MRI measurements were calculated and the association between KFA and tibiofemoral rotation was evaluated using Pearson correlation and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The mean tibiofemoral rotation was 8.7°± 5.5° in CT and 4.2°± 6.7° in MRI ( P < .001). The mean KFA was 2.4°± 3.1° in CT and 14.9°± 6.4° in MRI ( P < .001). The difference in the KFA between CT and MRI moderately correlated with the difference in tibiofemoral rotation between imaging modalities ( r = 0.529; P < .001). Conclusion: Tibiofemoral rotation measurements significantly differed between CT and MRI, with larger values observed in CT. The difference between imaging modalities correlated with the degree of knee flexion during image acquisition. This observation should be considered when assessing tibiofemoral rotation, as current reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-279097
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Tibiofemoral Rotation Measurements Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Comparing Tibiofemoral Rotation Measurements Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability

article en

Abstract

Background: Tibiofemoral rotation is an emerging parameter, especially in assessing patellofemoral instability. However, reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality and do not consider the effect of knee flexion during image acquisition. Purpose: To analyze the differences in tibiofemoral rotation measurements between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 78 knees in 72 patients were included. All patients underwent surgery for patellofemoral instability at our institution and preoperative CT and MRI were available. Tibiofemoral rotation was measured on axial CT and MRI, whereas the respective knee flexion angle (KFA) was measured on sagittal images. Tibiofemoral rotation values in which the tibia was externally rotated to the femur were handled as positive values. Differences between CT and MRI measurements were calculated and the association between KFA and tibiofemoral rotation was evaluated using Pearson correlation and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The mean tibiofemoral rotation was 8.7°± 5.5° in CT and 4.2°± 6.7° in MRI ( P < .001). The mean KFA was 2.4°± 3.1° in CT and 14.9°± 6.4° in MRI ( P < .001). The difference in the KFA between CT and MRI moderately correlated with the difference in tibiofemoral rotation between imaging modalities ( r = 0.529; P < .001). Conclusion: Tibiofemoral rotation measurements significantly differed between CT and MRI, with larger values observed in CT. The difference between imaging modalities correlated with the degree of knee flexion during image acquisition. This observation should be considered when assessing tibiofemoral rotation, as current reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.