Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Virtual Wards: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence.

Background Virtual wards offer an alternative to traditional inpatient care, delivering acute care, monitoring, and treatment at home to prevent hospital admissions or facilitate early discharge. The aim of our qualitative systematic review was to understand the barriers to and facilitators for the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual wards from the perspective of any involved stakeholder using behavioural change models.Methods The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024519627). The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. A three-stage deductive content analysis (DCA), as recommended for applying the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation- Behaviour) and TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework) to qualitative data, was conducted to categorise and map the barriers and facilitators to virtual wards identified in the included studies, using the TDF domains as a guiding framework.Results Searches initially identified 7,489 articles. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Common barriers for patients and family members were the lack of language skills, technical skills, and medical knowledge. Caregivers were also required to take on significant medical responsibilities while patients had to remain self-motivated. The introduction of appropriate training was seen as a valuable facilitator. Healthcare providers faced numerous technological barriers that had the potential to affect care delivery. Strong leadership was an essential facilitator for effective care coordination in virtual wards. From a healthcare system perspective, the availability of resources such as staffing, equipment, and funding, along with standardized protocols, is crucial for the successful implementation of virtual wards.Conclusions Virtual wards can ease hospital capacity issues and support the delivery of safe and effective care in patients' own homes. However, to realise this potential, we must understand the barriers and facilitators to the use and successful implementation of virtual wards for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. This understanding will allow targeted strategies and interventions to be developed to support both the delivery and receipt, of care on virtual wards.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/90410
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Virtual Wards: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Virtual Wards: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence.

article en

Abstract

Background Virtual wards offer an alternative to traditional inpatient care, delivering acute care, monitoring, and treatment at home to prevent hospital admissions or facilitate early discharge. The aim of our qualitative systematic review was to understand the barriers to and facilitators for the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual wards from the perspective of any involved stakeholder using behavioural change models.Methods The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024519627). The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. A three-stage deductive content analysis (DCA), as recommended for applying the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation- Behaviour) and TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework) to qualitative data, was conducted to categorise and map the barriers and facilitators to virtual wards identified in the included studies, using the TDF domains as a guiding framework.Results Searches initially identified 7,489 articles. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Common barriers for patients and family members were the lack of language skills, technical skills, and medical knowledge. Caregivers were also required to take on significant medical responsibilities while patients had to remain self-motivated. The introduction of appropriate training was seen as a valuable facilitator. Healthcare providers faced numerous technological barriers that had the potential to affect care delivery. Strong leadership was an essential facilitator for effective care coordination in virtual wards. From a healthcare system perspective, the availability of resources such as staffing, equipment, and funding, along with standardized protocols, is crucial for the successful implementation of virtual wards.Conclusions Virtual wards can ease hospital capacity issues and support the delivery of safe and effective care in patients' own homes. However, to realise this potential, we must understand the barriers and facilitators to the use and successful implementation of virtual wards for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. This understanding will allow targeted strategies and interventions to be developed to support both the delivery and receipt, of care on virtual wards.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Virtual Wards: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence. · Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS