The Problem of Translation of Discourse Markers (Based on the Russian and English Languages)

The article examines discourse markers as linguistically specific units and discusses the problems of their translation. Discourse markers are units that are capable of organizing a text and expressing different pragmatic meanings. This study examines discourse markers that express the degree of reliability (of course, certainly, obviously, naturally, etc.). The purpose of the study is to describe the semantic properties of discourse markers that determined their classification as linguistically specific units. Linguistically specific units are those that do not have an unambiguous lexical analogue in another language. The hypothesis of the study is that the linguistic specificity of the discourse markers of the studied group is primarily associated with their multifunctionality, that is, the ability to express different pragmatic functions depending on the context. The material for the study is the data from the English-Russian and Russian-English parallel corpora of the National Russian Corpus. The study established that the translation of these discourse markers is determined by pragmatic function in the text, individual authorial preferences and stylistic limitations. The semantics of discourse markers is flexible and is largely determined by the context. discourse markers perform two types of functions: the main functions associated with the expression of confidence in the reported, and peripheral functions involving dialogization of the text (introduction of a new topic, establishment of contact, attention management, etc.) and expression (amplification) of emotions. When choosing discourse markers, the influence of individual preferences of the translator is noted. Analyzed discourse markers have stylistic limitations that are taken into account during translation. This study confirms the presence of an intermediary mental system between the original text and its translation. The translator first creates an internal semantic representation of the text content, after which he conveys it by means of another language. Thus, the discourse markers of this group are complex words for translation, when working with which it is necessary to take into account the anthropocentric (cognitive) and functional aspects of translation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology and language
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2024.04.07
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Problem of Translation of Discourse Markers (Based on the Russian and English Languages)

2 citations
Technology and language
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
1.91
article

The Problem of Translation of Discourse Markers (Based on the Russian and English Languages)

article en
2 citations

Abstract

The article examines discourse markers as linguistically specific units and discusses the problems of their translation. Discourse markers are units that are capable of organizing a text and expressing different pragmatic meanings. This study examines discourse markers that express the degree of reliability (of course, certainly, obviously, naturally, etc.). The purpose of the study is to describe the semantic properties of discourse markers that determined their classification as linguistically specific units. Linguistically specific units are those that do not have an unambiguous lexical analogue in another language. The hypothesis of the study is that the linguistic specificity of the discourse markers of the studied group is primarily associated with their multifunctionality, that is, the ability to express different pragmatic functions depending on the context. The material for the study is the data from the English-Russian and Russian-English parallel corpora of the National Russian Corpus. The study established that the translation of these discourse markers is determined by pragmatic function in the text, individual authorial preferences and stylistic limitations. The semantics of discourse markers is flexible and is largely determined by the context. discourse markers perform two types of functions: the main functions associated with the expression of confidence in the reported, and peripheral functions involving dialogization of the text (introduction of a new topic, establishment of contact, attention management, etc.) and expression (amplification) of emotions. When choosing discourse markers, the influence of individual preferences of the translator is noted. Analyzed discourse markers have stylistic limitations that are taken into account during translation. This study confirms the presence of an intermediary mental system between the original text and its translation. The translator first creates an internal semantic representation of the text content, after which he conveys it by means of another language. Thus, the discourse markers of this group are complex words for translation, when working with which it is necessary to take into account the anthropocentric (cognitive) and functional aspects of translation.

Technology and language
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.