An ontology-based approach for harmonizing metrics in bike network evaluations

The urgency to decarbonize the transportation sector has accelerated the adoption of micro-mobility solutions, with cycling network development witnessing remarkable growth. Robust and quantitative evaluation frameworks are needed to evaluate the quality of such developments. While a plethora of bike network evaluation approaches exist, their diversity creates issues of interpretability and comparability due to varying metrics and domain-specific terms. We present three contributions to address these challenges. First, we construct a formal ontology, VeloNEMO, that captures key attributes of evaluation metrics for harmonizing bike network evaluation metrics. Second, we generate a machine-readable knowledge base containing these metrics, enabling meta-analyses and resolving some of the existing terminological discrepancies. Third, we propose recommendations for transparent and comparable metric descriptions across various evaluation approaches, illustrated by exploratory metric selection scenarios for a forthcoming bike network evaluation tool. In summary, our research addresses the need for a structured and shared vocabulary for bike network evaluations. This ontology-based approach aims to improve the coherence of evaluation methods as the field of bike network planning continues to evolve, ultimately supporting decision-making for sustainable transportation planning.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000691695
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An ontology-based approach for harmonizing metrics in bike network evaluations

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

An ontology-based approach for harmonizing metrics in bike network evaluations

article en

Abstract

The urgency to decarbonize the transportation sector has accelerated the adoption of micro-mobility solutions, with cycling network development witnessing remarkable growth. Robust and quantitative evaluation frameworks are needed to evaluate the quality of such developments. While a plethora of bike network evaluation approaches exist, their diversity creates issues of interpretability and comparability due to varying metrics and domain-specific terms. We present three contributions to address these challenges. First, we construct a formal ontology, VeloNEMO, that captures key attributes of evaluation metrics for harmonizing bike network evaluation metrics. Second, we generate a machine-readable knowledge base containing these metrics, enabling meta-analyses and resolving some of the existing terminological discrepancies. Third, we propose recommendations for transparent and comparable metric descriptions across various evaluation approaches, illustrated by exploratory metric selection scenarios for a forthcoming bike network evaluation tool. In summary, our research addresses the need for a structured and shared vocabulary for bike network evaluations. This ontology-based approach aims to improve the coherence of evaluation methods as the field of bike network planning continues to evolve, ultimately supporting decision-making for sustainable transportation planning.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
National Research Foundation, National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Branco Weiss Fellowship – Society in Science, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore-ETH Centre, Bundesamt für Energie
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.