Comparison of lipid droplet extraction from cell wall-deficient Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with pulsed electric fields or osmotic shock

Microalgal lipid droplets (LDs) are promising sources of pre-emulsified triacylglycerols (TAGs) and can be extracted aqueously due to their hydrophilicity. To develop more sustainable extraction processes, pulsed electric fields (PEF) and osmotic shock (OS) with NaCl were compared as treatments before aqueous LD extraction from a cell wall deficient microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The highest LD extraction yields were 54 % (0.6 gL−1) using OS and 42 % (0.5 gL−1) with PEF. Both treatments were most effective with cells from the late stationary phase of growth. LD extracts from both processes exhibited a TAG composition similar to the original biomass. LDs recovered after PEF appeared native (diameters from 1.4 to 2.0 μm), whereas OS caused LD coalescence (diameters from 1.9 to 2.6 μm). Both methods co-extracted nitrogenous compounds, while OS also co-extracted chlorophyll. OS and PEF for aqueous LD extraction provide greener alternatives to the widespread extraction of lipid using organic solvents

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000738793
Primary Topic
Algal biology and biofuel production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of lipid droplet extraction from cell wall-deficient Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with pulsed electric fields or osmotic shock

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Algal biology and biofuel production
article

Comparison of lipid droplet extraction from cell wall-deficient Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with pulsed electric fields or osmotic shock

article en

Abstract

Microalgal lipid droplets (LDs) are promising sources of pre-emulsified triacylglycerols (TAGs) and can be extracted aqueously due to their hydrophilicity. To develop more sustainable extraction processes, pulsed electric fields (PEF) and osmotic shock (OS) with NaCl were compared as treatments before aqueous LD extraction from a cell wall deficient microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The highest LD extraction yields were 54 % (0.6 gL−1) using OS and 42 % (0.5 gL−1) with PEF. Both treatments were most effective with cells from the late stationary phase of growth. LD extracts from both processes exhibited a TAG composition similar to the original biomass. LDs recovered after PEF appeared native (diameters from 1.4 to 2.0 μm), whereas OS caused LD coalescence (diameters from 1.9 to 2.6 μm). Both methods co-extracted nitrogenous compounds, while OS also co-extracted chlorophyll. OS and PEF for aqueous LD extraction provide greener alternatives to the widespread extraction of lipid using organic solvents

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Algal biology and biofuel production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.