Behind the Scenes: Perceptions and Management of Conflict in Teams with Varying Levels of Virtuality and National Diversity

This study explores how individuals perceive and manage conflict in various team settings employing different degrees of virtuality and national diversity through a mixed-methods approach using 223 surveys and 23 semi-structured interviews of participants who completed a computer-based simulation. Utilizing the model of individualized conceptualization of conflict, the study found that individual and contextual factors play crucial roles together and shape team dynamics and conflict. The quantitative findings indicate that virtuality negatively influences team performance scores and highlight that individuals in fully virtual, highly diverse teams report the highest perceptions of conflict presence compared to other teams. The qualitative examination supports such findings by demonstrating that individuals in virtual team settings engaged in self-censorship behaviors that may contribute to conflict-related challenges. It also found that individual differences in cultural awareness, previous experience, personalities, leadership, and conflict management skills interplay with contextual factors, influencing and shaping how individuals perceive, conceptualize, and manage conflict. These interactions were discussed in relation to the study's statistically insignificant findings and their potential implications for the inconsistent findings of previous studies examining the role of virtuality and national diversity in team dynamics and conflict. This study advances the current understanding of conflict in multinational virtual teams by highlighting the importance of including individual-level data in understanding team conflict. It also makes a unique contribution by showing the benefits of employing the mixed-methods experimental design that provides a complete picture of team conflict and allows for a comparison of the varying degrees of virtuality and national diversity.

Publication Details

Journal
Carnegie Mellon University Library Publishing Service
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34891/nvjt-f878
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behind the Scenes: Perceptions and Management of Conflict in Teams with Varying Levels of Virtuality and National Diversity

Carnegie Mellon University Library Publishing Service
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Behind the Scenes: Perceptions and Management of Conflict in Teams with Varying Levels of Virtuality and National Diversity

article en

Abstract

This study explores how individuals perceive and manage conflict in various team settings employing different degrees of virtuality and national diversity through a mixed-methods approach using 223 surveys and 23 semi-structured interviews of participants who completed a computer-based simulation. Utilizing the model of individualized conceptualization of conflict, the study found that individual and contextual factors play crucial roles together and shape team dynamics and conflict. The quantitative findings indicate that virtuality negatively influences team performance scores and highlight that individuals in fully virtual, highly diverse teams report the highest perceptions of conflict presence compared to other teams. The qualitative examination supports such findings by demonstrating that individuals in virtual team settings engaged in self-censorship behaviors that may contribute to conflict-related challenges. It also found that individual differences in cultural awareness, previous experience, personalities, leadership, and conflict management skills interplay with contextual factors, influencing and shaping how individuals perceive, conceptualize, and manage conflict. These interactions were discussed in relation to the study's statistically insignificant findings and their potential implications for the inconsistent findings of previous studies examining the role of virtuality and national diversity in team dynamics and conflict. This study advances the current understanding of conflict in multinational virtual teams by highlighting the importance of including individual-level data in understanding team conflict. It also makes a unique contribution by showing the benefits of employing the mixed-methods experimental design that provides a complete picture of team conflict and allows for a comparison of the varying degrees of virtuality and national diversity.

Carnegie Mellon University Library Publishing Service
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.