Two architectures of neural networks in distance approximation

In this research paper, we examine recurrent and linear neural networks to determine the relationship between the amount of data needed to achieve generalization and data dimensionality, as well as the relationship between data dimensionality and the necessary computational complexity. To achieve this, we also explore the optimal topologies for each network, discuss potential problems in their training, and propose solutions. In our experiments, the relation- ship between the amount of data needed to achieve generalization and data dimensionality was linear for feed-forward neural networks and exponential for recurrent ones. However, the required computational complexity appears to grow exponentially with increasing dimensionality. We also compared the networks’ accuracy in both distance approxima- tion and classification to the most popular alternative, siamese networks, which outperformed both linear and recurrent networks in classification despite having lower accuracy in exact distance approximation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34808/tq2024/28.2/c
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two architectures of neural networks in distance approximation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Two architectures of neural networks in distance approximation

article en

Abstract

In this research paper, we examine recurrent and linear neural networks to determine the relationship between the amount of data needed to achieve generalization and data dimensionality, as well as the relationship between data dimensionality and the necessary computational complexity. To achieve this, we also explore the optimal topologies for each network, discuss potential problems in their training, and propose solutions. In our experiments, the relation- ship between the amount of data needed to achieve generalization and data dimensionality was linear for feed-forward neural networks and exponential for recurrent ones. However, the required computational complexity appears to grow exponentially with increasing dimensionality. We also compared the networks’ accuracy in both distance approxima- tion and classification to the most popular alternative, siamese networks, which outperformed both linear and recurrent networks in classification despite having lower accuracy in exact distance approximation.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.