Malaysia's Counter-Terrorism Strategy: A Top-Down Policy Analysis of Legislative, Rehabilitative, and Educational Approaches

This paper examines Malaysia’s bureaucratic perspective on implementing the Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (PCVE) policy. It takes a top-down approach and focuses on the ability of policymakers to design clear and practical policy objectives and manage the implementation phase. Interviews were conducted with eight prominent figures and stakeholders who are involved in the implementation of this policy from various fields, including the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Ministry of Defence, the Special Branch (E8) of the Royal Malaysia Police, Members of Malaysian Parliament and ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly Caucus (AIPA Caucus), experts, and academics. The study results indicate that the PCVE policy is implemented centrally, with power passing from the first tier of government to the second tier and the third tier playing a less active role. The implementation consists of three phases: before, during, and after detention, with distinct stakeholders for each phase. These findings are helpful for Malaysian law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and non-governmental organizations tasked with preventing and detecting terrorist acts.

Publication Details

Journal
Intellectual Discourse
Published
2025-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v33i1.1839
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Malaysia's Counter-Terrorism Strategy: A Top-Down Policy Analysis of Legislative, Rehabilitative, and Educational Approaches

Intellectual Discourse
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Malaysia's Counter-Terrorism Strategy: A Top-Down Policy Analysis of Legislative, Rehabilitative, and Educational Approaches

article en

Abstract

This paper examines Malaysia’s bureaucratic perspective on implementing the Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (PCVE) policy. It takes a top-down approach and focuses on the ability of policymakers to design clear and practical policy objectives and manage the implementation phase. Interviews were conducted with eight prominent figures and stakeholders who are involved in the implementation of this policy from various fields, including the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Ministry of Defence, the Special Branch (E8) of the Royal Malaysia Police, Members of Malaysian Parliament and ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly Caucus (AIPA Caucus), experts, and academics. The study results indicate that the PCVE policy is implemented centrally, with power passing from the first tier of government to the second tier and the third tier playing a less active role. The implementation consists of three phases: before, during, and after detention, with distinct stakeholders for each phase. These findings are helpful for Malaysian law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and non-governmental organizations tasked with preventing and detecting terrorist acts.

Intellectual DiscourseVol. 33(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Malaysia's Counter-Terrorism Strategy: A Top-Down Policy Analysis of Legislative, Rehabilitative, and Educational Approaches · Intellectual Discourse (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS