The Aptly Named ‘Cratylus’? Berkeley’s Approach to Shaftesbury in <em>Alciphron</em>, III

In Alciphron (1732) Berkeley engages in extensivecriticism of the Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury. Berkeley’scriticism of the Earl is remarkably aggressive. It culminates in §§12-14 ofthe Third Dialogue, where Berkeley launches a vicious personalattack against Shaftesbury, under the name of ‘Cratylus’. In this way the thirddialogue differs radically in tone from Berkeley’s other philosophical worksand has been viewed with shock and derision. In this paper I will show thatBerkeley names Shaftesbury ‘Cratylus’ because he wants to impute the kind ofself-deception against the Earl that Plato vividly describes in thedialogue Cratylus. This, moreover, is the key to correctlyunderstanding Berkeley’s argument against Shaftesbury’s moral theory, which isan attack on a pernicious form of moral subjectivism, rather than an attack onvirtue ethics, as is commonly thought.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25894/jmp.2440
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Aptly Named ‘Cratylus’? Berkeley’s Approach to Shaftesbury in Alciphron, III

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

The Aptly Named ‘Cratylus’? Berkeley’s Approach to Shaftesbury in Alciphron, III

article en

Abstract

In Alciphron (1732) Berkeley engages in extensivecriticism of the Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury. Berkeley’scriticism of the Earl is remarkably aggressive. It culminates in §§12-14 ofthe Third Dialogue, where Berkeley launches a vicious personalattack against Shaftesbury, under the name of ‘Cratylus’. In this way the thirddialogue differs radically in tone from Berkeley’s other philosophical worksand has been viewed with shock and derision. In this paper I will show thatBerkeley names Shaftesbury ‘Cratylus’ because he wants to impute the kind ofself-deception against the Earl that Plato vividly describes in thedialogue Cratylus. This, moreover, is the key to correctlyunderstanding Berkeley’s argument against Shaftesbury’s moral theory, which isan attack on a pernicious form of moral subjectivism, rather than an attack onvirtue ethics, as is commonly thought.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.