Legal Ambiguities in the Renewal of Building Use Rights: A Policy and Interpretative Analysis

The right to use buildings in the Western legal sense before conversion comes from postal rights stipulated in Article 71 of the Civil Code. Government Regulation Number 40 of 1996 states that renewal is submitted no later than 2 (two) years before the expiration of the Right to Use Building, which means that if it has passed 2 (two) years before the end of the Right to Build, the right holder cannot make a renewal of the Right to Use Building that he has. However, in PMNA Number 9 of 1999, it is stated that it is submitted within a grace period of 2 (two) years, which means that even though it has passed 2 (two) years before the Right to Build expires, the right holder can still apply for Renewal of the Right to Build. There are 2 (two) different terms. It is used regarding terms of time for submitting an extension application for Building Use Rights; then, it can give rise to various interpretations and implications. Matter This will affect the determination policies in each office land as the authorized body to grant the extension request the term of Building Use Rights, as well as against the Official Land Deed Maker and other parties who are in contact with the Rights Building.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v15i3.15160
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Ambiguities in the Renewal of Building Use Rights: A Policy and Interpretative Analysis

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Legal Ambiguities in the Renewal of Building Use Rights: A Policy and Interpretative Analysis

article en

Abstract

The right to use buildings in the Western legal sense before conversion comes from postal rights stipulated in Article 71 of the Civil Code. Government Regulation Number 40 of 1996 states that renewal is submitted no later than 2 (two) years before the expiration of the Right to Use Building, which means that if it has passed 2 (two) years before the end of the Right to Build, the right holder cannot make a renewal of the Right to Use Building that he has. However, in PMNA Number 9 of 1999, it is stated that it is submitted within a grace period of 2 (two) years, which means that even though it has passed 2 (two) years before the Right to Build expires, the right holder can still apply for Renewal of the Right to Build. There are 2 (two) different terms. It is used regarding terms of time for submitting an extension application for Building Use Rights; then, it can give rise to various interpretations and implications. Matter This will affect the determination policies in each office land as the authorized body to grant the extension request the term of Building Use Rights, as well as against the Official Land Deed Maker and other parties who are in contact with the Rights Building.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.