Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Evaluation

A wide array of techniques within explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) have been developed to measure the importance of features in machine learning models. A notable portion of these methods draws upon principles of cooperative game theory (CGT), with the Shapley value emerging as a widely used solution concept. Despite the rising prominence of the Shapley value, other promising solutions from cooperative game theory—such as the Nucleolus, Banzhaf power index, Shapley-Shubik power index, and solutions to conflicting claims problems—have been comparatively overlooked, even though they hold significant potential. In this dissertation, multiple XAI methods based on these other CGT solutions are proposed. These methods were applied in both linear and classification scenarios, addressing datasets with both independent features and multicollinearity concerns. Prior work considered the sensitivity of explanations through permutation tests or the accuracy of explanations to evaluate XAI methods. However, these approaches do not address the uncertainty or the consistency associated with the feature importance evaluations. In this dissertation, a weighted Shannon entropy-based permutation relative importance evaluation (PRIME) metric is proposed to assess the consistency of feature importance methods in determining the relevance of the features. This metric integrates the established methods of permutation tests and weighted Shannon entropy to conduct the evaluation. The novelty of this dissertation lies in (1) demonstrating the applicability of numerous CGT solutions to measure feature importance values, (2) showing the effectiveness of these techniques using permutation relative importance evaluation metric, and (3) employing these methods to investigate input data that can be used for an agent-based model. The results show that the Shapley-Shubik, Banzhaf power index and conflicting claims problems-based feature importance methods offer advantages over Shapley value-based methods due to their unique properties when explaining feature importance values. The findings also demonstrate that PRIME can effectively evaluate feature importance methods.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/xy0g-x273
Primary Topic
Libraries and Information Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Evaluation

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Libraries and Information Services
article

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Evaluation

article en

Abstract

A wide array of techniques within explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) have been developed to measure the importance of features in machine learning models. A notable portion of these methods draws upon principles of cooperative game theory (CGT), with the Shapley value emerging as a widely used solution concept. Despite the rising prominence of the Shapley value, other promising solutions from cooperative game theory—such as the Nucleolus, Banzhaf power index, Shapley-Shubik power index, and solutions to conflicting claims problems—have been comparatively overlooked, even though they hold significant potential. In this dissertation, multiple XAI methods based on these other CGT solutions are proposed. These methods were applied in both linear and classification scenarios, addressing datasets with both independent features and multicollinearity concerns. Prior work considered the sensitivity of explanations through permutation tests or the accuracy of explanations to evaluate XAI methods. However, these approaches do not address the uncertainty or the consistency associated with the feature importance evaluations. In this dissertation, a weighted Shannon entropy-based permutation relative importance evaluation (PRIME) metric is proposed to assess the consistency of feature importance methods in determining the relevance of the features. This metric integrates the established methods of permutation tests and weighted Shannon entropy to conduct the evaluation. The novelty of this dissertation lies in (1) demonstrating the applicability of numerous CGT solutions to measure feature importance values, (2) showing the effectiveness of these techniques using permutation relative importance evaluation metric, and (3) employing these methods to investigate input data that can be used for an agent-based model. The results show that the Shapley-Shubik, Banzhaf power index and conflicting claims problems-based feature importance methods offer advantages over Shapley value-based methods due to their unique properties when explaining feature importance values. The findings also demonstrate that PRIME can effectively evaluate feature importance methods.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Libraries and Information Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.