Investigating the Function of Alternative Splicing in Synapse Formation

Synapse formation is essential for brain and neural circuit development, but the mechanisms of this process remain incompletely understood. Synaptogenesis in mouse hippocampi requires the postsynaptic adhesion G-protein-coupled-receptor (aGPCR) Latrophilin-3 (LPHN3), which is alternatively spliced into numerous different isoforms. Previous work indicates that some splice variants are not involved in synaptogenic activity, but not all variants have been characterized. Identifying which splice isoforms are necessary or extraneous for synaptogenesis will provide a basis for future research into potential mechanisms for synapse formation with a role for necessary exons. Functions for non-synaptogenic isoforms can also be explored. This project aims to determine whether splice variants that lack part of the GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domain or the third intracellular loop are required for synapse formation. These domains, respectively, are hypothesized to contribute to the adhesion function of LPHN3 and known to be important for GPCR signaling through G-protein coupling. To test if these exons are necessary for synaptogenesis, LPHN3 isoform expression is genetically manipulated in primary hippocampal neuron cultures by either a CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out or a Cre/Lox rescue approach; the resulting synapse density is then calculated for both approaches. Here, we found that genetic manipulation of the two exons of interest using the CRISPR/Cas9 system resulted in loss of global LPHN3 protein levels, rendering synapse density uninterpretable and highlighting the limitations of using CRISPR/Cas9 to control splice isoform expression. The Cre/Lox rescue system resulted in overall increase in synapse density in all rescue constructs; this poor recapitulation of the endogenous system indicates a need for improved construct design. In demonstrating the challenges of controlling splice variant expression, this project offers insight into the strengths and limitations of various genetic manipulation strategies to study alternative splicing. This work also paves the way for future successes in characterizing the necessity of different LPHN3 splice isoforms in synaptogenesis.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/wf133tt2480
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Function of Alternative Splicing in Synapse Formation

Stanford Digital Repository
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
article

Investigating the Function of Alternative Splicing in Synapse Formation

article en

Abstract

Synapse formation is essential for brain and neural circuit development, but the mechanisms of this process remain incompletely understood. Synaptogenesis in mouse hippocampi requires the postsynaptic adhesion G-protein-coupled-receptor (aGPCR) Latrophilin-3 (LPHN3), which is alternatively spliced into numerous different isoforms. Previous work indicates that some splice variants are not involved in synaptogenic activity, but not all variants have been characterized. Identifying which splice isoforms are necessary or extraneous for synaptogenesis will provide a basis for future research into potential mechanisms for synapse formation with a role for necessary exons. Functions for non-synaptogenic isoforms can also be explored. This project aims to determine whether splice variants that lack part of the GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domain or the third intracellular loop are required for synapse formation. These domains, respectively, are hypothesized to contribute to the adhesion function of LPHN3 and known to be important for GPCR signaling through G-protein coupling. To test if these exons are necessary for synaptogenesis, LPHN3 isoform expression is genetically manipulated in primary hippocampal neuron cultures by either a CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out or a Cre/Lox rescue approach; the resulting synapse density is then calculated for both approaches. Here, we found that genetic manipulation of the two exons of interest using the CRISPR/Cas9 system resulted in loss of global LPHN3 protein levels, rendering synapse density uninterpretable and highlighting the limitations of using CRISPR/Cas9 to control splice isoform expression. The Cre/Lox rescue system resulted in overall increase in synapse density in all rescue constructs; this poor recapitulation of the endogenous system indicates a need for improved construct design. In demonstrating the challenges of controlling splice variant expression, this project offers insight into the strengths and limitations of various genetic manipulation strategies to study alternative splicing. This work also paves the way for future successes in characterizing the necessity of different LPHN3 splice isoforms in synaptogenesis.

Stanford Digital Repository
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating the Function of Alternative Splicing in Synapse Formation · Stanford Digital Repository (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS