Pedestrian-Motorist Self-Reported Behavioral Intentions Toward Using Alternative and Standard Safety Infrastructure

The increasing trend in pedestrian-motorist incidents on American roadways warrants a novel solution for improving roadway safety. Alternative crosswalk designs have piqued communities both in the United States and abroad. Designs range from slight changes in colors to extravagant illusions of the roadway falling beneath users. These crosswalk designs are not novel, literature on their efficacy as safety infrastructure is modest with mixed results. The purpose of the study was to expand the current literature on alternative crosswalk designs. The author hypothesized that the differences in behavioral intentions at alternative and standard safety infrastructure would be greater for younger male road users and these differences would diminish as road users got older. This study aimed to answer these questions by examining the relationship between behavioral intentions for pedestrians (going out of the way and walking a minute or more out of their way) and motorists (yielding for pedestrians) using three different crosswalk designs (continental, color aditivo, and colorful 3-dimensional). An online survey recruited 525 participants. Three well-known measures were used as covariates: the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR), the Pedestrian Behavioral Questionnaire (PBQ), and the Driver Behavioral Questionnaire (DBQ). There were three major findings. Respondents had higher intentions of going out of the way and yielding at standard and 3-dimensional crosswalk designs compared to color aditivo designs (Cruz-Diez, 2024). This finding could be attributed to participants not recognizing color aditivo designs as crosswalks and could suggest that color changes to crosswalk designs should be consistent with existing road marking colors (e.g., primarily white, with yellow or red) and not varying color hues (i.e., greens and blues). Male’s age appeared to be a stronger predictor for intentions to yield, whereas, for females, age predicted intentions to go out of the way to cross traffic at all crosswalk designs. That is, older male motorists had higher intentions to yield. Similarly, as females got older, they had higher intentions to walk out of the way to use a crosswalk. Finally, for motorists the covariates for social desirability (BIDR) and intentional unsafe behaviors (DBQ) contributed medium to large effects in most analysis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/gr6r-5762
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedestrian-Motorist Self-Reported Behavioral Intentions Toward Using Alternative and Standard Safety Infrastructure

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Pedestrian-Motorist Self-Reported Behavioral Intentions Toward Using Alternative and Standard Safety Infrastructure

article en

Abstract

The increasing trend in pedestrian-motorist incidents on American roadways warrants a novel solution for improving roadway safety. Alternative crosswalk designs have piqued communities both in the United States and abroad. Designs range from slight changes in colors to extravagant illusions of the roadway falling beneath users. These crosswalk designs are not novel, literature on their efficacy as safety infrastructure is modest with mixed results. The purpose of the study was to expand the current literature on alternative crosswalk designs. The author hypothesized that the differences in behavioral intentions at alternative and standard safety infrastructure would be greater for younger male road users and these differences would diminish as road users got older. This study aimed to answer these questions by examining the relationship between behavioral intentions for pedestrians (going out of the way and walking a minute or more out of their way) and motorists (yielding for pedestrians) using three different crosswalk designs (continental, color aditivo, and colorful 3-dimensional). An online survey recruited 525 participants. Three well-known measures were used as covariates: the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR), the Pedestrian Behavioral Questionnaire (PBQ), and the Driver Behavioral Questionnaire (DBQ). There were three major findings. Respondents had higher intentions of going out of the way and yielding at standard and 3-dimensional crosswalk designs compared to color aditivo designs (Cruz-Diez, 2024). This finding could be attributed to participants not recognizing color aditivo designs as crosswalks and could suggest that color changes to crosswalk designs should be consistent with existing road marking colors (e.g., primarily white, with yellow or red) and not varying color hues (i.e., greens and blues). Male’s age appeared to be a stronger predictor for intentions to yield, whereas, for females, age predicted intentions to go out of the way to cross traffic at all crosswalk designs. That is, older male motorists had higher intentions to yield. Similarly, as females got older, they had higher intentions to walk out of the way to use a crosswalk. Finally, for motorists the covariates for social desirability (BIDR) and intentional unsafe behaviors (DBQ) contributed medium to large effects in most analysis.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.