The Effect of the Type of Goal Setting Procedure Task Difficulty and Feedback on Psychomotor Performance

The present experiment examined the effect of two levels of task difficulty (easy and difficult), two levels of feedback (feedback and no feedback), and three types of goal setting procedure (participative, assigned, and no goal setting) on performance. To control for effects due to goal difficulty, the assigned goals were yoked to the participative goals. A computerized letter cancellation task was employed to measure subject performance on three dependent variables: the number of correct. letter cancellations, the number of incorrect cancellations, and the reaction time between correct. cancellations ~ The results showed that the number of incorrect cancellations was not sensitive to the experimental manipulation; however, the number of correct cancellations and reaction time were responsive. Subjects correctly canceled more targets and had a faster reaction time on the easy task than the difficult one and when they received feedback than when they did not. There were no significant goal setting main effects; however, a significant interaction occurred between feedback and goal setting.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2024-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/zpz9-5v28
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of the Type of Goal Setting Procedure Task Difficulty and Feedback on Psychomotor Performance

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
article

The Effect of the Type of Goal Setting Procedure Task Difficulty and Feedback on Psychomotor Performance

article en

Abstract

The present experiment examined the effect of two levels of task difficulty (easy and difficult), two levels of feedback (feedback and no feedback), and three types of goal setting procedure (participative, assigned, and no goal setting) on performance. To control for effects due to goal difficulty, the assigned goals were yoked to the participative goals. A computerized letter cancellation task was employed to measure subject performance on three dependent variables: the number of correct. letter cancellations, the number of incorrect cancellations, and the reaction time between correct. cancellations ~ The results showed that the number of incorrect cancellations was not sensitive to the experimental manipulation; however, the number of correct cancellations and reaction time were responsive. Subjects correctly canceled more targets and had a faster reaction time on the easy task than the difficult one and when they received feedback than when they did not. There were no significant goal setting main effects; however, a significant interaction occurred between feedback and goal setting.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effect of the Type of Goal Setting Procedure Task Difficulty and Feedback on Psychomotor Performance · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS