Aeolus + Processes, Technical Note 5

We analyzed the scale-dependent effects of Aeolus winds in the ECMWF system in<br> relation to flow properties by evaluating analysis increments, defined as the differences<br> between Aeolus analyses and associated short-range forecasts, in observing system experi-<br> ments (OSEs) used in the project. Additionally, we assessed the impact of Aeolus data on<br> predictability improvements in comparison with COSMIC2 data.<br> Our results show that data assimilation leads to similar systematic increments in the<br> CTRL, Aeolus, and COSMIC2 experiments. Near the equator, tropospheric biases are<br> largely associated with balanced zonal flow, whereas in the outer tropical latitudes they<br> are primarily related to unbalanced meridional flow. The assimilation consistently enhances<br> the vertical shear of the zonal wind in CTRL, an effect further amplified by Aeolus assim-<br> ilation, particularly during the QBO disruption of 2019/2020. Based on these findings, we<br> recommend that Aeolus2 maximizes the vertical resolution of its measurements.<br> On average, the assimilation of Aeolus winds produces the largest analysis increments<br> in planetary-scale zonal winds, especially in Kelvin waves and the n = 1 Rossby waves.<br> The 4D-Var system generates comparable effects on meridional and zonal winds from both<br> Aeolus and COSMIC2 data. However, the increments exhibit different balance properties;<br> Aeolus assimilation decreases unbalanced meridional wind in the stratosphere, whereas<br> COSMIC2 assimilation increases it. Forecast errors, defined as the differences between OSE forecasts and analyses, exhibit<br> distinct growth patterns in the zonal and meridional winds across different layers. In the<br> early stages, error growth is primarily influenced by model error. After approximately three<br> days, subsynoptic-scale errors become saturated, and the growth is increasingly dominated<br> by planetary-scale errors in the zonal winds, particularly in the stratosphere. Predictability<br> gains from the assimilation of Aeolus winds were estimated at approximately 2.7 hours in<br> the tropopause layer and 5 hours in the lower stratosphere for 3-day forecasts (Fig. 1). For<br> comparison, assimilation of COSMIC2 data in the same layers yielded predictability gains<br> of 7 and 13 hours, respectively, during the studied WP4 period (1–14 December 2022).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Hamburg
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.17791
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aeolus + Processes, Technical Note 5

Universität Hamburg
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Aeolus + Processes, Technical Note 5

article en

Abstract

We analyzed the scale-dependent effects of Aeolus winds in the ECMWF system in<br> relation to flow properties by evaluating analysis increments, defined as the differences<br> between Aeolus analyses and associated short-range forecasts, in observing system experi-<br> ments (OSEs) used in the project. Additionally, we assessed the impact of Aeolus data on<br> predictability improvements in comparison with COSMIC2 data.<br> Our results show that data assimilation leads to similar systematic increments in the<br> CTRL, Aeolus, and COSMIC2 experiments. Near the equator, tropospheric biases are<br> largely associated with balanced zonal flow, whereas in the outer tropical latitudes they<br> are primarily related to unbalanced meridional flow. The assimilation consistently enhances<br> the vertical shear of the zonal wind in CTRL, an effect further amplified by Aeolus assim-<br> ilation, particularly during the QBO disruption of 2019/2020. Based on these findings, we<br> recommend that Aeolus2 maximizes the vertical resolution of its measurements.<br> On average, the assimilation of Aeolus winds produces the largest analysis increments<br> in planetary-scale zonal winds, especially in Kelvin waves and the n = 1 Rossby waves.<br> The 4D-Var system generates comparable effects on meridional and zonal winds from both<br> Aeolus and COSMIC2 data. However, the increments exhibit different balance properties;<br> Aeolus assimilation decreases unbalanced meridional wind in the stratosphere, whereas<br> COSMIC2 assimilation increases it. Forecast errors, defined as the differences between OSE forecasts and analyses, exhibit<br> distinct growth patterns in the zonal and meridional winds across different layers. In the<br> early stages, error growth is primarily influenced by model error. After approximately three<br> days, subsynoptic-scale errors become saturated, and the growth is increasingly dominated<br> by planetary-scale errors in the zonal winds, particularly in the stratosphere. Predictability<br> gains from the assimilation of Aeolus winds were estimated at approximately 2.7 hours in<br> the tropopause layer and 5 hours in the lower stratosphere for 3-day forecasts (Fig. 1). For<br> comparison, assimilation of COSMIC2 data in the same layers yielded predictability gains<br> of 7 and 13 hours, respectively, during the studied WP4 period (1–14 December 2022).

Universität Hamburg
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB), Universität Hamburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.