Minimal Surfaces and Topology of Martensitic Phase Transformations

Martensitic phase transformations and the shape memory effect have been extensively studied, with various theories proposed to understand their mechanisms. This work develops a model based on differential geometry to distinguish martensitic phase transformations from ordinary phase transformations and shape memory alloys from ordinary martensites, excluding cases involving magnetism. First, we analyse the surface S of a given charge density distribution in crystals using density functional theory (DFT) for Cu, Al, Na, Zr, and NiTi in different phases.We find that S corresponding to different crystals in different phases converge to different triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS). The point group of a crystal is a subgroup of its corresponding TPMS, similar to its relationship with the point group of its corresponding Bravais lattice. Notably, the TPMS of two end phases in a martensitic transformation share the same genus, unlike in ordinary phase transformations. Next, we explore the topological continuity between the two end phases. Since martensitic transformations are diffusionless, the connections between lattice points and their nearest neighbours remain invariant. These connections can be represented by skeletal graphs derived from TPMS. Hence, the invariance of connections means the topological equivalence between skeletal graphs (TPMS) of the two end phases. Finally, we investigate the geometric reason that distinguishes shape memory alloys from ordinary martensites. Since shape memory alloys undergo reversible martensitic transformations, we introduce the concept of “geometric entropy,” analogous to thermodynamic entropy but determined by the geometry of S and the arrangement of lattice points. DFT calculations reveal that only shape memory alloys can have zero-barrier transformation paths, which coincide with paths where geometric entropy remains unchanged. Thus, the shape memory effect is possible if a martensitic phase transformation occurs without variation in its geometric entropy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25560/117413
Primary Topic
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimal Surfaces and Topology of Martensitic Phase Transformations

Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
article

Minimal Surfaces and Topology of Martensitic Phase Transformations

article en

Abstract

Martensitic phase transformations and the shape memory effect have been extensively studied, with various theories proposed to understand their mechanisms. This work develops a model based on differential geometry to distinguish martensitic phase transformations from ordinary phase transformations and shape memory alloys from ordinary martensites, excluding cases involving magnetism. First, we analyse the surface S of a given charge density distribution in crystals using density functional theory (DFT) for Cu, Al, Na, Zr, and NiTi in different phases.We find that S corresponding to different crystals in different phases converge to different triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS). The point group of a crystal is a subgroup of its corresponding TPMS, similar to its relationship with the point group of its corresponding Bravais lattice. Notably, the TPMS of two end phases in a martensitic transformation share the same genus, unlike in ordinary phase transformations. Next, we explore the topological continuity between the two end phases. Since martensitic transformations are diffusionless, the connections between lattice points and their nearest neighbours remain invariant. These connections can be represented by skeletal graphs derived from TPMS. Hence, the invariance of connections means the topological equivalence between skeletal graphs (TPMS) of the two end phases. Finally, we investigate the geometric reason that distinguishes shape memory alloys from ordinary martensites. Since shape memory alloys undergo reversible martensitic transformations, we introduce the concept of “geometric entropy,” analogous to thermodynamic entropy but determined by the geometry of S and the arrangement of lattice points. DFT calculations reveal that only shape memory alloys can have zero-barrier transformation paths, which coincide with paths where geometric entropy remains unchanged. Thus, the shape memory effect is possible if a martensitic phase transformation occurs without variation in its geometric entropy.

Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Shape Memory Alloy Transformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Minimal Surfaces and Topology of Martensitic Phase Transformations · Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS