The ECOWAS State: Principal-Agent Theory and De Facto Governments in a Time of Democratic Crisis

In a time when democracy is under attack through a proliferation of military regimes, it is essential to resolve the legal problem of representation between the ECOWAS state as a legal entity and de facto regimes who acquire the capacity to act on behalf of the state. Using the principal-agent theory and case studies, this article will attempt to resolve problems with representation of a state by a de facto government. It will argue that de facto governments should not be seen as authentic agents of the state and cannot act on its behalf, especially in the context of multilateralism. This is because the sovereignty costs incurred under a multilateral obligation such as The ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance allow for state accountability towards democratic governance. The article concluded that there are great implications for the state as a legal entity when a de facto government is in power, however, that popular support of such a government can ratify its lack of legitimacy

Publication Details

Journal
1000 Functional Connectomes Project
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25430/pupj-phrg-2024-2-3
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ECOWAS State: Principal-Agent Theory and De Facto Governments in a Time of Democratic Crisis

1000 Functional Connectomes Project
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
article

The ECOWAS State: Principal-Agent Theory and De Facto Governments in a Time of Democratic Crisis

article en

Abstract

In a time when democracy is under attack through a proliferation of military regimes, it is essential to resolve the legal problem of representation between the ECOWAS state as a legal entity and de facto regimes who acquire the capacity to act on behalf of the state. Using the principal-agent theory and case studies, this article will attempt to resolve problems with representation of a state by a de facto government. It will argue that de facto governments should not be seen as authentic agents of the state and cannot act on its behalf, especially in the context of multilateralism. This is because the sovereignty costs incurred under a multilateral obligation such as The ECOWAS Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance allow for state accountability towards democratic governance. The article concluded that there are great implications for the state as a legal entity when a de facto government is in power, however, that popular support of such a government can ratify its lack of legitimacy

1000 Functional Connectomes Project
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.