Comparison and hydrodynamic performance analysis of positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger aft hull lines

ObjectiveAs the hydrodynamic performance of a positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger (CSD) is significantly different from that of an ordinary ship, this paper analyzes its performance in order to assist in the rational selection and design of stern lines.MethodsFirst, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is applied to carry out simulation verification and model resistance test validation. On this basis, the hydrodynamic performance of two hulls with different stern shapes, namely twin deadwood and twin skeg, are compared and analyzed in aspects including calm water resistance behavior, stern wake field, axial wake fraction, and nonuniform level of axial wake field. ResultsThe total resistance coefficient of the twin skeg hull is lower than that of the twin deadwood hull at each target speed. At the design speed, the total resistance coefficient of the former is 8.6% lower than that of the latter, while the wake object function (WOF) of the latter is judged to be better than that of the former by 11.0% in terms of nonuniform level of axial wake field. ConclusionThe results of this study can provide valuable references for the line design and optimization of similar hull types.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03558
Primary Topic
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and hydrodynamic performance analysis of positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger aft hull lines

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
article

Comparison and hydrodynamic performance analysis of positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger aft hull lines

article en

Abstract

ObjectiveAs the hydrodynamic performance of a positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger (CSD) is significantly different from that of an ordinary ship, this paper analyzes its performance in order to assist in the rational selection and design of stern lines.MethodsFirst, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is applied to carry out simulation verification and model resistance test validation. On this basis, the hydrodynamic performance of two hulls with different stern shapes, namely twin deadwood and twin skeg, are compared and analyzed in aspects including calm water resistance behavior, stern wake field, axial wake fraction, and nonuniform level of axial wake field. ResultsThe total resistance coefficient of the twin skeg hull is lower than that of the twin deadwood hull at each target speed. At the design speed, the total resistance coefficient of the former is 8.6% lower than that of the latter, while the wake object function (WOF) of the latter is judged to be better than that of the former by 11.0% in terms of nonuniform level of axial wake field. ConclusionThe results of this study can provide valuable references for the line design and optimization of similar hull types.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), International Marine and Dredging Consultants (BE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison and hydrodynamic performance analysis of positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger aft hull lines · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS