Analyzing Decision-making Bias in Female CEOs through the Lens of Behavioral Strategy

Managers face with cognitive and behavioral biases in their judgments and decisions in the organization, which are the main cause of misjudgments and disagreements in many situations. The purpose of this study is to examine the decision biases of female CEOs in the context of behavioral strategy. Although women have made progress in leadership positions, unconscious bias, social expectations and organizational structures still hinder their full participation and influence strategic initiatives. This research is applied research with a qualitative approach and using thematic analysis. The data was obtained through in-depth interviews with 15 female managers and continued until theoretical saturation. Data analysis was conducted using Max QDA2020 software. A total of 76 primary codes, 18 sub-themes and 13 main themes were extracted, which were categorized into three categories. Affective/emotional bias, cognitive bias and gender stereotype bias are the three main categories of bias in the decisions of female CEOs. Affective/emotional biases include the following four biases: prior emotional stimuli, overoptimism, emotional contagion, and fear of potential loss. Cognitive biases include five: Information processing bias, memory bias, lack of attention in decision making, judgment bias, and overconfidence. Gender stereotypes include multiple roles, social expectations and norms, perfectionism and comparison with male peers. By identifying and understanding these biases, it is possible to understand the unique challenges and opportunities of women managers in complex strategic decision-making and to contribute to a more accurate understanding of the factors that shape the leadership behaviors and decision-making of female CEOs in organizations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22051/jwsps.2025.48425.2923
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Decision-making Bias in Female CEOs through the Lens of Behavioral Strategy

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Analyzing Decision-making Bias in Female CEOs through the Lens of Behavioral Strategy

article en

Abstract

Managers face with cognitive and behavioral biases in their judgments and decisions in the organization, which are the main cause of misjudgments and disagreements in many situations. The purpose of this study is to examine the decision biases of female CEOs in the context of behavioral strategy. Although women have made progress in leadership positions, unconscious bias, social expectations and organizational structures still hinder their full participation and influence strategic initiatives. This research is applied research with a qualitative approach and using thematic analysis. The data was obtained through in-depth interviews with 15 female managers and continued until theoretical saturation. Data analysis was conducted using Max QDA2020 software. A total of 76 primary codes, 18 sub-themes and 13 main themes were extracted, which were categorized into three categories. Affective/emotional bias, cognitive bias and gender stereotype bias are the three main categories of bias in the decisions of female CEOs. Affective/emotional biases include the following four biases: prior emotional stimuli, overoptimism, emotional contagion, and fear of potential loss. Cognitive biases include five: Information processing bias, memory bias, lack of attention in decision making, judgment bias, and overconfidence. Gender stereotypes include multiple roles, social expectations and norms, perfectionism and comparison with male peers. By identifying and understanding these biases, it is possible to understand the unique challenges and opportunities of women managers in complex strategic decision-making and to contribute to a more accurate understanding of the factors that shape the leadership behaviors and decision-making of female CEOs in organizations.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Alzahra University (IR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.