Analysis of the application value of prophylactic ileostomy after for middle and low rectal cancer surgery

[Objectives] To explore the application value of prophylactic ileostomy (PI) after middle and low rectal cancer surgery. [Methods] Clinical data were collected from 948 rectal cancer patients admitted to the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2013 and December 2023. According to the exclusion criteria, 195 patients were excluded, 753 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were categorized into the PI group (n=333) and the non-PI group (n=420) based on whether they received PI after middle and low rectal cancer surgery. The operative and postoperative indicators were compared between the two groups. [Results] In terms of surgery-related indicators, there were no significant differences between the two groups in emergency surgery, laparoscopic surgery, surgical blood loss, and surgical blood transfusion (P>0.05). The proportion of patients in the non-PI group who used linear cutter closure device nail number > 1, anastomosis-to-anal margin distance< 5 cm, and operation time > 180 minutes was significantly lower than that in the PI group (P<0.001). In terms of postoperative-related indicators, there were no significant differences in anastomotic leakage, other complications, ICU admission, and second surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). The PI group had a lower proportion of patients requiring secondary hospitalization and anal canal placement, shorter hospital stays and pelvic drainage tube removal times, and higher hospitalization costs compared to the non-PI group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). [Conclusion] PI after middle and low rectal cancer surgery improves outcomes related to secondary hospitalization and anal canal placement, shortens hospital stays and pelvic drainage tube removal times, demonstrating good application value and providing a reference for clinical stoma decision-making.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19668/j.cnki.issn1674-0491.2024.05.014
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the application value of prophylactic ileostomy after for middle and low rectal cancer surgery

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Analysis of the application value of prophylactic ileostomy after for middle and low rectal cancer surgery

article en

Abstract

[Objectives] To explore the application value of prophylactic ileostomy (PI) after middle and low rectal cancer surgery. [Methods] Clinical data were collected from 948 rectal cancer patients admitted to the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2013 and December 2023. According to the exclusion criteria, 195 patients were excluded, 753 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were categorized into the PI group (n=333) and the non-PI group (n=420) based on whether they received PI after middle and low rectal cancer surgery. The operative and postoperative indicators were compared between the two groups. [Results] In terms of surgery-related indicators, there were no significant differences between the two groups in emergency surgery, laparoscopic surgery, surgical blood loss, and surgical blood transfusion (P>0.05). The proportion of patients in the non-PI group who used linear cutter closure device nail number > 1, anastomosis-to-anal margin distance< 5 cm, and operation time > 180 minutes was significantly lower than that in the PI group (P<0.001). In terms of postoperative-related indicators, there were no significant differences in anastomotic leakage, other complications, ICU admission, and second surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). The PI group had a lower proportion of patients requiring secondary hospitalization and anal canal placement, shorter hospital stays and pelvic drainage tube removal times, and higher hospitalization costs compared to the non-PI group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). [Conclusion] PI after middle and low rectal cancer surgery improves outcomes related to secondary hospitalization and anal canal placement, shortens hospital stays and pelvic drainage tube removal times, demonstrating good application value and providing a reference for clinical stoma decision-making.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Southwest Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Sichuan Medical University (CN), Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.