Systemic curricular injustice in initial teacher education through curriculum control and marketization

This paper argues that recent initial teacher education policy in England, combining curricular control and marketisation, presents a case of systemic curricular injustice. The initial teacher education core content framework, the government mandated content for all initial teacher education in England, represents a centralised curriculum that ignores local contexts and needs. Combined with the impact of the accreditation process for all providers embedded within the Initial Teacher Training (ITT) Market Review, these policies create a two-pronged system of exclusion: the core content framework restricts intellectual access to alternative ways of thinking about education, whilst the ITT Market Review restricts physical access to teacher education seeking to present such alternative approaches. Combining and mutually reinforcing social and spatial injustices, this paper argues that the policy space in England is actively producing and reproducing structural inequalities.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.117669
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic curricular injustice in initial teacher education through curriculum control and marketization

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

Systemic curricular injustice in initial teacher education through curriculum control and marketization

article en

Abstract

This paper argues that recent initial teacher education policy in England, combining curricular control and marketisation, presents a case of systemic curricular injustice. The initial teacher education core content framework, the government mandated content for all initial teacher education in England, represents a centralised curriculum that ignores local contexts and needs. Combined with the impact of the accreditation process for all providers embedded within the Initial Teacher Training (ITT) Market Review, these policies create a two-pronged system of exclusion: the core content framework restricts intellectual access to alternative ways of thinking about education, whilst the ITT Market Review restricts physical access to teacher education seeking to present such alternative approaches. Combining and mutually reinforcing social and spatial injustices, this paper argues that the policy space in England is actively producing and reproducing structural inequalities.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.