Marginal Pricing and the Energy Crisis: Where Should We Go?

The fundamental principle of marginal pricing in electricity markets has been strongly challenged following the recent European energy crisis. One of the main criticisms is the inability of current markets to drive investments, as spot prices provide only short term information about supply, demand, and costs. This paper revisits the seminal work of Boiteux 1960 in the context of the recent energy crisis to discuss the fundamental assumption of adapted capacity, which underpins the equality between long term and short term marginal costs in the theory of marginal pricing. We argue that capacity is no longer adapted to current economic conditions in Europe. We then leverage techniques of mathematical programming to generalize the results of Boiteux 1960 and propose a market clearing mechanism that preserves the efficiency of current short term marginal pricing to induce optimal plants operations while also providing a long term investment signal when capacities are not necessarily adapted. Through an analysis of captured margins, our proposal, which differs only marginally from the current market clearing, identifies plants that should remain in the current mix and those that are no longer economical. We also discuss possible extensions of our proposal to accommodate capacity markets and price caps. Finally, we implement our models with the French power mix and demonstrate their advantages over the current market clearing mechanism using a realistic case study.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.118374
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marginal Pricing and the Energy Crisis: Where Should We Go?

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Electric Power System Optimization
article

Marginal Pricing and the Energy Crisis: Where Should We Go?

article en

Abstract

The fundamental principle of marginal pricing in electricity markets has been strongly challenged following the recent European energy crisis. One of the main criticisms is the inability of current markets to drive investments, as spot prices provide only short term information about supply, demand, and costs. This paper revisits the seminal work of Boiteux 1960 in the context of the recent energy crisis to discuss the fundamental assumption of adapted capacity, which underpins the equality between long term and short term marginal costs in the theory of marginal pricing. We argue that capacity is no longer adapted to current economic conditions in Europe. We then leverage techniques of mathematical programming to generalize the results of Boiteux 1960 and propose a market clearing mechanism that preserves the efficiency of current short term marginal pricing to induce optimal plants operations while also providing a long term investment signal when capacities are not necessarily adapted. Through an analysis of captured margins, our proposal, which differs only marginally from the current market clearing, identifies plants that should remain in the current mix and those that are no longer economical. We also discuss possible extensions of our proposal to accommodate capacity markets and price caps. Finally, we implement our models with the French power mix and demonstrate their advantages over the current market clearing mechanism using a realistic case study.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Electric Power System Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.