A comparison of RMS moments and statistical divergences as ways to quantify the difference between beam phase space distributions

Accurately assessing the difference between two beam distributions in high-dimensional phase space is crucial for interpreting experimental or simulation results. In this paper, we compare the common method of RMS moments and mismatch factors, and the method of statistical divergences that give the total contribution of differences at all points. We first show that, in the case of commonly used initial distributions, there is a one-to-one correspondence between mismatch factors and statistical divergences. This enables us to show how the values of several popular divergences vary with the mismatch factors, independent of the orientation of the phase space ellipsoid. We utilize these results to propose evaluation standards for these popular divergences, which will help interpret their values in the context of beam phase space distributions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACOW
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18429/jacow-linac2024-tupb058
Primary Topic
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of RMS moments and statistical divergences as ways to quantify the difference between beam phase space distributions

JACOW
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
article

A comparison of RMS moments and statistical divergences as ways to quantify the difference between beam phase space distributions

article en

Abstract

Accurately assessing the difference between two beam distributions in high-dimensional phase space is crucial for interpreting experimental or simulation results. In this paper, we compare the common method of RMS moments and mismatch factors, and the method of statistical divergences that give the total contribution of differences at all points. We first show that, in the case of commonly used initial distributions, there is a one-to-one correspondence between mismatch factors and statistical divergences. This enables us to show how the values of several popular divergences vary with the mismatch factors, independent of the orientation of the phase space ellipsoid. We utilize these results to propose evaluation standards for these popular divergences, which will help interpret their values in the context of beam phase space distributions.

JACOW
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), European Spallation Source (SE), Institute of Modern Physics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison of RMS moments and statistical divergences as ways to quantify the difference between beam phase space distributions · JACOW (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS