Effects of pooling, specialization, and discretionary task completion on queueing performance

Pooling, unpooling/specialization, and discretionary task completion are typical operational strategies in queueing systems that arise in healthcare, call centers, and online sales. These strategies may have advantages and disadvantages in different operational environments. This paper uses the M=M=1 and M=M=2 queues to study the impact of pooling, specialization, and discretionary task completion on the average queue length. Closed-form solutions for the average M=M=2 queue length are derived. Computational examples illustrate how the average queue length changes with the strength of pooling, specialization, and discretionary task completion. Finally, several conjectures are made in the paper.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.112052
Primary Topic
Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of pooling, specialization, and discretionary task completion on queueing performance

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
article

Effects of pooling, specialization, and discretionary task completion on queueing performance

article en

Abstract

Pooling, unpooling/specialization, and discretionary task completion are typical operational strategies in queueing systems that arise in healthcare, call centers, and online sales. These strategies may have advantages and disadvantages in different operational environments. This paper uses the M=M=1 and M=M=2 queues to study the impact of pooling, specialization, and discretionary task completion on the average queue length. Closed-form solutions for the average M=M=2 queue length are derived. Computational examples illustrate how the average queue length changes with the strength of pooling, specialization, and discretionary task completion. Finally, several conjectures are made in the paper.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of pooling, specialization, and discretionary task completion on queueing performance · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS