Physics-based machine learning for predicting urban air pollution using decadal time series data

Air quality significantly impacts public health and well-being. Effective air quality policies depend on accurate pollution predictions, even in countries with low pollution levels like Norway. Although LSTM networks are well-suited for time series data, they require large datasets and are computationally expensive, limiting their use for physical process data like air pollution dynamics. Physics-Based Machine Learning (PBML) integrates physical laws into models, offering more accurate and interpretable predictions for air pollution. In this study, we compare PBML, LSTM, and Linear Regression Models (LRM) to identify significant predictors of air pollution using daily traffic, weather, and air pollution data between 2009–2018 from three major Norwegian cities. Our findings demonstrate that PBML outperforms both LSTM and LRM in predicting air pollution levels. This paper contributes to the expanding literature on PBML by offering more precise air pollution predictions on hyperlocal scales, informed by local traffic and weather conditions, ultimately supporting better data-driven policy decisions.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.118289
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-based machine learning for predicting urban air pollution using decadal time series data

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Physics-based machine learning for predicting urban air pollution using decadal time series data

article en

Abstract

Air quality significantly impacts public health and well-being. Effective air quality policies depend on accurate pollution predictions, even in countries with low pollution levels like Norway. Although LSTM networks are well-suited for time series data, they require large datasets and are computationally expensive, limiting their use for physical process data like air pollution dynamics. Physics-Based Machine Learning (PBML) integrates physical laws into models, offering more accurate and interpretable predictions for air pollution. In this study, we compare PBML, LSTM, and Linear Regression Models (LRM) to identify significant predictors of air pollution using daily traffic, weather, and air pollution data between 2009–2018 from three major Norwegian cities. Our findings demonstrate that PBML outperforms both LSTM and LRM in predicting air pollution levels. This paper contributes to the expanding literature on PBML by offering more precise air pollution predictions on hyperlocal scales, informed by local traffic and weather conditions, ultimately supporting better data-driven policy decisions.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Physics-based machine learning for predicting urban air pollution using decadal time series data · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS