Evaluating Use of Biomarker Testing Among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Among patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), biomarker testing is used to profile genetic mutations and protein levels in the individual’s tumor, enabling providers to match patients with the treatment best suited for their tumor type. The objective of this dissertation was to examine key aspects the real-world use of biomarker testing in clinical practice, and the three studies in this dissertation used cancer registry data linked with Medicare claims from 2009-2018 to: (1) evaluate racial disparities in the receipt of biomarker testing; (2) examine initiation of systemic therapy associated with biomarker testing; and (3) characterize survival outcomes associated with the chronological ordering of biomarker testing and systemic therapy. Biomarker testing was suboptimal with only 58.2% (n=15556) of patients receiving testing. Black patients were significantly less likely to receive biomarker testing than White patients (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.94). Receipt of biomarker testing was significantly associated with initiation of systemic treatment within six months of diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.34-1.56). Among patients who had receipt of biomarker testing within three months of diagnosis and systemic therapy within six months of diagnosis, increased time to biomarker testing and clinical factors were predictors of preemptive initiation of systemic therapy (i.e., initiation of therapy prior to biomarker testing). Receipt of biomarker testing followed by initiation of systemic therapy was associated with lower all-cause (aHR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84) and lung cancer death (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR]: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.91) compared to no receipt of biomarker testing or initiation of systemic therapy. Preemptive initiation of systemic therapy was not associated with all-cause or lung cancer-specific survival benefit relative to no testing and no therapy. Findings from this dissertation suggest that barriers to receipt of testing need to be investigated for equitable access to biomarker testing-directed therapies, and that identifying reasons for preemptive treatment is necessary to ensure initiation of the most suitable first-line therapy. Collectively, these findings can inform development of interventions to ensure equitable, optimal and timely receipt of biomarker testing and testing-directed treatments for patients with aNSCLC.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/4m4h-f925
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Use of Biomarker Testing Among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

UNC Libraries
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Evaluating Use of Biomarker Testing Among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

article en

Abstract

Among patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), biomarker testing is used to profile genetic mutations and protein levels in the individual’s tumor, enabling providers to match patients with the treatment best suited for their tumor type. The objective of this dissertation was to examine key aspects the real-world use of biomarker testing in clinical practice, and the three studies in this dissertation used cancer registry data linked with Medicare claims from 2009-2018 to: (1) evaluate racial disparities in the receipt of biomarker testing; (2) examine initiation of systemic therapy associated with biomarker testing; and (3) characterize survival outcomes associated with the chronological ordering of biomarker testing and systemic therapy. Biomarker testing was suboptimal with only 58.2% (n=15556) of patients receiving testing. Black patients were significantly less likely to receive biomarker testing than White patients (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.94). Receipt of biomarker testing was significantly associated with initiation of systemic treatment within six months of diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.34-1.56). Among patients who had receipt of biomarker testing within three months of diagnosis and systemic therapy within six months of diagnosis, increased time to biomarker testing and clinical factors were predictors of preemptive initiation of systemic therapy (i.e., initiation of therapy prior to biomarker testing). Receipt of biomarker testing followed by initiation of systemic therapy was associated with lower all-cause (aHR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84) and lung cancer death (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR]: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.91) compared to no receipt of biomarker testing or initiation of systemic therapy. Preemptive initiation of systemic therapy was not associated with all-cause or lung cancer-specific survival benefit relative to no testing and no therapy. Findings from this dissertation suggest that barriers to receipt of testing need to be investigated for equitable access to biomarker testing-directed therapies, and that identifying reasons for preemptive treatment is necessary to ensure initiation of the most suitable first-line therapy. Collectively, these findings can inform development of interventions to ensure equitable, optimal and timely receipt of biomarker testing and testing-directed treatments for patients with aNSCLC.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.