¿De qué se acusa a la persona jurídica? Relaciones entre responsabilidad penal corporativa, nemo tenetur y compliance

The substantive grounds for corporate criminal liability shape the very scope of what can be criminally charged. On one view, liability is based on the absence or ineffectiveness of a compliance program; on another, it depends strictly on the commission of offences as set out in Article 31 bis (1) and (2) of the Spanish Criminal Code. That underlying conception will, in turn, determine how the nemo tenetur principle—the right against self-incrimination—is handled in criminal proceedings. This study explores the foundations of corporate criminal liability by critically reviewing the leading theoretical approaches to Article 31 bis. It then evaluates the practical implications of extending nemo tenetur as a procedural right to corporations, seeking to strike the necessary balance between effective criminal enforcement and the fundamental rights of corporations.

Publication Details

Journal
Revistas académicas Universidad EAFIT (Universidad EAFIT)
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17230/nfp21.104.7
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

¿De qué se acusa a la persona jurídica? Relaciones entre responsabilidad penal corporativa, nemo tenetur y compliance

Revistas académicas Universidad EAFIT (Universidad EAFIT)
Criminal Law and Policy
article

¿De qué se acusa a la persona jurídica? Relaciones entre responsabilidad penal corporativa, nemo tenetur y compliance

article en

Abstract

The substantive grounds for corporate criminal liability shape the very scope of what can be criminally charged. On one view, liability is based on the absence or ineffectiveness of a compliance program; on another, it depends strictly on the commission of offences as set out in Article 31 bis (1) and (2) of the Spanish Criminal Code. That underlying conception will, in turn, determine how the nemo tenetur principle—the right against self-incrimination—is handled in criminal proceedings. This study explores the foundations of corporate criminal liability by critically reviewing the leading theoretical approaches to Article 31 bis. It then evaluates the practical implications of extending nemo tenetur as a procedural right to corporations, seeking to strike the necessary balance between effective criminal enforcement and the fundamental rights of corporations.

Revistas académicas Universidad EAFIT (Universidad EAFIT)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Criminal Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.