Navigating through learning tensions at the front end : How firms can motivate paradoxical thinking when scrrening the creativity of ideas

Idea screening is crucial as it must select the most promising ideas that are best suited to increase front-end success. Although paradox theory indicates that learning tensions characterize the evaluation and screening of idea creativity, we know little about how idea screeners navigate through the associated competing demands. In response, we investigate the effects of idea screeners' paradoxical thinking on the assessment of the creativity of ideas as well as its motivational antecedents of paradoxical thinking. By analyzing a survey (N = 326) and an experiment (N = 292), we show that paradoxical thinking increases front-end success and both dimensions of idea creativity (encompassing meaningfulness and novelty). In turn, by creating a motivational context (comprising decision autonomy, encouragement to take risks, and tolerance for mistakes), firms can provide the antecedents to adopt paradoxical thinking. Our study contributes to and extends the literature on screening idea creativity and paradox theory.

Publication Details

Journal
Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-2025012710862
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating through learning tensions at the front end : How firms can motivate paradoxical thinking when scrrening the creativity of ideas

Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Open Source Software Innovations
article

Navigating through learning tensions at the front end : How firms can motivate paradoxical thinking when scrrening the creativity of ideas

article en

Abstract

Idea screening is crucial as it must select the most promising ideas that are best suited to increase front-end success. Although paradox theory indicates that learning tensions characterize the evaluation and screening of idea creativity, we know little about how idea screeners navigate through the associated competing demands. In response, we investigate the effects of idea screeners' paradoxical thinking on the assessment of the creativity of ideas as well as its motivational antecedents of paradoxical thinking. By analyzing a survey (N = 326) and an experiment (N = 292), we show that paradoxical thinking increases front-end success and both dimensions of idea creativity (encompassing meaningfulness and novelty). In turn, by creating a motivational context (comprising decision autonomy, encouragement to take risks, and tolerance for mistakes), firms can provide the antecedents to adopt paradoxical thinking. Our study contributes to and extends the literature on screening idea creativity and paradox theory.

Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating through learning tensions at the front end : How firms can motivate paradoxical thinking when scrrening the creativity of ideas · Universitätsbibliothek Kassel (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS