Derisking failure: rethinking the promises of infrastructure-led development

Since the 2008 financial crisis an emerging regime of ‘infrastructure-led development’ places connectivity infrastructure at its centre. We begin this article with the proposition that many of the developmental promises associated with infrastructure have already failed, yet these failures rarely involve a rethinking of what underpins their promises. Drawing on ethnographic research on a failed project in the Republic of Georgia, the deep sea port of Anaklia, we suggest that an ethnographic engagement with failed infrastructure is necessary in order to tease out, and consequently challenge, the power geometries inherent in infrastructure-led development. We show that failure is constantly foregrounded in infrastructural projects such as the Anaklia port, yet a series of discursive, legal and economic infrastructures are put in place to disavow it. These infrastructures must be understood as part of a larger, global, consensus that places the right to accumulate capital above care for populations and ecosystems.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.118267
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Derisking failure: rethinking the promises of infrastructure-led development

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

Derisking failure: rethinking the promises of infrastructure-led development

article en

Abstract

Since the 2008 financial crisis an emerging regime of ‘infrastructure-led development’ places connectivity infrastructure at its centre. We begin this article with the proposition that many of the developmental promises associated with infrastructure have already failed, yet these failures rarely involve a rethinking of what underpins their promises. Drawing on ethnographic research on a failed project in the Republic of Georgia, the deep sea port of Anaklia, we suggest that an ethnographic engagement with failed infrastructure is necessary in order to tease out, and consequently challenge, the power geometries inherent in infrastructure-led development. We show that failure is constantly foregrounded in infrastructural projects such as the Anaklia port, yet a series of discursive, legal and economic infrastructures are put in place to disavow it. These infrastructures must be understood as part of a larger, global, consensus that places the right to accumulate capital above care for populations and ecosystems.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.