New Inter-State Case Ireland v. UK regarding the Northern Ireland Troubles before the ECtHR

This Saar Blueprint examines the second inter-state application submitted by Ireland against the United Kingdom to the European Court of Human Rights. The application concerns the Northern Ireland (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act, which establishes a framework for conducting reviews of Troubles-related offences, sets up an immunity scheme and establishes a statutory limitation period for certain civil proceedings. The Government of the Republic of Ireland contends that these provisions are incompatible with Articles 1, 2 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This paper critically engages with the contested provisions and offers a detailed analysis of the relevant Convention articles, paying particular attention to the concept of positive obligations and the challenges of transitional justice. Ultimately, the author discusses the compatibility of the Act with the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Convention.

Publication Details

Journal
IntRechtDok
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17176/20250618-083140-0
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Inter-State Case Ireland v. UK regarding the Northern Ireland Troubles before the ECtHR

IntRechtDok
European and International Law Studies
article

New Inter-State Case Ireland v. UK regarding the Northern Ireland Troubles before the ECtHR

article en

Abstract

This Saar Blueprint examines the second inter-state application submitted by Ireland against the United Kingdom to the European Court of Human Rights. The application concerns the Northern Ireland (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act, which establishes a framework for conducting reviews of Troubles-related offences, sets up an immunity scheme and establishes a statutory limitation period for certain civil proceedings. The Government of the Republic of Ireland contends that these provisions are incompatible with Articles 1, 2 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This paper critically engages with the contested provisions and offers a detailed analysis of the relevant Convention articles, paying particular attention to the concept of positive obligations and the challenges of transitional justice. Ultimately, the author discusses the compatibility of the Act with the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Convention.

IntRechtDok
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.