Determination of Major Elements in Small-Weight Soil and Sediment Samples by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Pressed-Powder Pellets

The analysis of small-weight samples utilizing X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) poses a pivotal technical challenge in determining the chemical composition of valuable and scarce materials. Furthermore, the application of XRF to verify the homogeneity of reference materials has sparked debates regarding the minimum sample weight. At present, most of the geological samples (including reference material) are at the particle size of 74μm (−200 mesh) and the conventional sample weight is approximately 4g for XRF analysis with pressed-powder pellets. Here, 0.1g weight soil or sediment was used for pressed-powder pellet preparation. The diameter of the XRF spectrometry sample box mask was changed to 12mm, and the diameter of the field view light barrier was reduced to 10mm. Based on the previously optimized instrumental measurement conditions, we successfully established a 0.1g sample weight analytical method for the quantification of ten major elements (SiO2, Al2O3, TFe2O3, MgO, Cao, Na2O, K2O, Mn, Ti, and P) utilizing wavelength dispersive XRF, which significantly reduced the necessary sample weight. This method 1employed a diverse range of 32 geochemical reference materials, encompassing variou types and content gradients. The detection limit of the 0.1g sample weight analysis method was between 14μ/g and 0.35%, and the precisioniitalic>=12) was less than 3.9%. Through comparative analysis, the results of the erence materials were all within the standard value range, and the absolute value of relative error (|RE|) was between 0 and 15.7%. There was no significant difference with the 4g sample weight analysis results (|RE| ranged from 0.3% to 28.3%). The practical sample results determined by the method of 0.1g sample and the conventional method of 4g sample are consistent. The established XRF method for the 0.1g weight sample is reliable.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15898/j.ykcs.202403040030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of Major Elements in Small-Weight Soil and Sediment Samples by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Pressed-Powder Pellets

1 citations
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
1.88
article

Determination of Major Elements in Small-Weight Soil and Sediment Samples by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Pressed-Powder Pellets

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The analysis of small-weight samples utilizing X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) poses a pivotal technical challenge in determining the chemical composition of valuable and scarce materials. Furthermore, the application of XRF to verify the homogeneity of reference materials has sparked debates regarding the minimum sample weight. At present, most of the geological samples (including reference material) are at the particle size of 74μm (−200 mesh) and the conventional sample weight is approximately 4g for XRF analysis with pressed-powder pellets. Here, 0.1g weight soil or sediment was used for pressed-powder pellet preparation. The diameter of the XRF spectrometry sample box mask was changed to 12mm, and the diameter of the field view light barrier was reduced to 10mm. Based on the previously optimized instrumental measurement conditions, we successfully established a 0.1g sample weight analytical method for the quantification of ten major elements (SiO2, Al2O3, TFe2O3, MgO, Cao, Na2O, K2O, Mn, Ti, and P) utilizing wavelength dispersive XRF, which significantly reduced the necessary sample weight. This method 1employed a diverse range of 32 geochemical reference materials, encompassing variou types and content gradients. The detection limit of the 0.1g sample weight analysis method was between 14μ/g and 0.35%, and the precisioniitalic>=12) was less than 3.9%. Through comparative analysis, the results of the erence materials were all within the standard value range, and the absolute value of relative error (|RE|) was between 0 and 15.7%. There was no significant difference with the 4g sample weight analysis results (|RE| ranged from 0.3% to 28.3%). The practical sample results determined by the method of 0.1g sample and the conventional method of 4g sample are consistent. The established XRF method for the 0.1g weight sample is reliable.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CN), Jiangsu Provincial Institute of Geological Survey (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Determination of Major Elements in Small-Weight Soil and Sediment Samples by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Pressed-Powder Pellets · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS